Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING & ZONING MEETING <br />NOVEMBER 8, 1989 <br />• greater than it would be for the beauty shop in his opinion. <br />• <br />Cindy Evans stated that she spoke with Sue Hodad from the <br />Transportation Department. Cindy explained that she has one <br />full -time employee plus herself working full -time and two <br />part -time employees. Sue felt that with the square footage <br />and the number of employees would not interfere with rush <br />hour traffic, and not considered to have a impact on the <br />traffic flow. <br />Gene MacNameir, owner of Merry Maids stated that an average <br />of 25 to 30 cars per day between 7:30 and 8:00 am drive into <br />the business, and she doesn't feel that the beauty shop would <br />create this much traffic. <br />Robert King asked how many chairs would be in the shop. <br />Cindy stated five. The original beauty shop had between four <br />and five chairs. <br />When the business was an insurance office there were many <br />times the parking lot (which holds approximately 20 cars) was <br />full.. <br />Jack Evans stated that with only five chairs it would be <br />probable that at the most only 10 cars at a time would be <br />parked. <br />Cindy Evans stated that every weekday morning only 1 <br />hairstylist is there and two stylists in the afternoons. On <br />Saturdays is the only day that five stylist would be working <br />and four stylists on Friday. <br />Al Robinson explained that the people in the audience aren't <br />aware of the complications in this matter. It would not be <br />fair to set a precedence and allow a non - conforming business <br />to intensify. <br />There was considerable discussion comparing Merry Maids to <br />the beauty salon. <br />MOTION: Alan Irwin moved that since the rezone from <br />Commercial to R -1 Single- Family in 1983 the business Merry <br />Maids at 6352 Hodgson road existed with 25 to 30 employees <br />and the rezoning made Merry Maids operation a non- conforming <br />use it is the interpretation that the proposed beauty salon <br />of five chairs would decrease the non - conformity and <br />therefore should be allowed. Al Robinson seconded the motion <br />and the motion was approved with Mr. Chase abstaining because <br />he joined the meeting half way through discussion. <br />This issue does not have to appear before the City Council <br />for approval. <br />REVIEW OF MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST FROM NICHOLAS <br />Page 3 <br />