Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING <br />December 19, 1989 <br />Brandywood. Estates contingent upon meeting recommendations of <br />the letters dated December 6, 1989 from the planner and the <br />engineer as follows: <br />1. Lot size and zoning. There is no sentiment to <br />rezone the land to R -1. The lot sizes should be <br />adjusted to reflect R -1X requirements. <br />2. Drainage and ponding will need to be better <br />addressed. For example the engineer notes the <br />"park" will likely be the drainage area. <br />3. The concept plan be modified so as to eliminate <br />double frontage lots adjacent to 12th Avenue and <br />reduce the number of double frontage lots against <br />Birch Street. <br />4. Park and trail issues should be reviewed with the <br />park board. <br />5. Other street and road issues addressed by the <br />engineer will have to be rectified. <br />6. Before submittal of a preliminary plat approval <br />letters or agreements should be obtained from other <br />review agencies including Rice Creek Watershed <br />District, DNR, Army Corps of Engineers, and Anoka <br />County. <br />7. And finally, before submittal of the preliminary <br />plat a commitment from the city council to extend <br />public utilities to the area is needed, i.e. no <br />sewer, no subdivision. <br />DISCUSSION OF A CITY INITIATED REZONING FOR A PORTION OF THE <br />WENZEL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF LAKE DRIVE AND <br />AQUA LANE (FROM TABLE OF NOVEMBER 8, 1989). <br />The Economic Development Committee reviewed the staff <br />proposed rezoning of the General Business portion of the <br />Elsie Wenzel property. This was done at its meeting of <br />November 28th. <br />The EDC recommended rezoning both the R -1 and General <br />Business areas to the Planned Unit Development district. <br />This would give the land owner some ability to operate in the <br />market place but would require the submittal of a very <br />detailed plan for the board and city council review. If the <br />plan showed poor relationship between different uses or <br />showed normal strip commercial development it could (would) <br />be denied. <br />Mr. Irwin discussed his opinion of a PUD zone. He felt this <br />is an overlay zone, that the General Business and R -1 zoning <br />Page 8 <br />