01/13/1988 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Lee and Ione Robinson own a large amount of land in the northwest part of the city. At present they wish to divide the land among their grandchildren and retain a ten acre parcel for themselves. Lee Robinson brought a copy of a contract for deed that would give one of the grandchildren a contractural interest in 63 acres of land. The exhibit attatched to the deed describes the two parcels. A certificate of survey is not provided with this request as with large simply defined parcels Anoka County does not require a survey for recording purposes. Lee also provided a rough sketch showing the location and size of both the ten and the sixty three acre parcel. In the staff report by John Miller, the recommended action is to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Lee and Ione Robinson for a minor subdivision creating two parcels measuring ten and sixty three acres as described in Application 87 -31. MOTION: Mr. McLean moved to approve application 87 -31 Lot Split for Lee and Ione Robinson to City Council. Ms.Averbeck seconded the motion and the motion was carried unanimously. KENT ROESSLER'S PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR LAKE VIEW PLACE ADDITION APPLICATION 87 -32. Kent Roessler wishes to plat approximately 7.7 acres adjacent to LaMotte Drive and south of Centerville Lake. The east side of the property is adjacent to the City of Centerville. Roessler wishes to divide the land into 17 residential lots. The land has sewer available to it. Glen Simondson - 1566 LaMotte Drive, voiced his concern regarding the traffic pattern and drainage. He also is concerned with the lot size. Roger Hoffmeister - 1588 LaMotte Drive, is concerned regarding the water problem in their area. The sewer is backing up every year in the area. Their houses are on the same level and they worry about getting water in their basements. Jim Hines - 6519 LaMotte Drive, is concerned regarding his own lot. Jim said he wouldn't have bought the house if he knew a road was coming in next to his home. He doesn't like the idea of Mr. Roessler taking a residential lot and turning it into a road!! MOTION: McLean moved to table Application 87 -32 because of inadequate information necessary to consider. Ms. Nelson seconded the motion and the motion was carried unanimously.