Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD November 9, 1988 <br />couldn't sell their buyer lot 6 without losing half of the <br />bigger building. <br />The LaRocques propose to subdivide lot 6 at a right angle to <br />Lake Drive. The northerly portion of the subdivided lot <br />would be attached to lot 5 and the southerly part of lot 6 <br />would become part of lot 7. By doing this, the applicants <br />would retain ownership of the land on which the big pole <br />barn is located, as well as maintaining a 12.8 foot setback <br />from the new property line. In addition, the LaRocques <br />could sell the residence and the two garages. A 12 foot <br />plus setback would be maintained between the garages and the <br />new property line. <br />After discussion a motion was made. <br />MOTION: Arlene Averback moved to recommend to City Council <br />approval the lot combination for Chester and Cecelia <br />LaRocque, Application #88 -32. <br />Elmer Crohn seconded the motion and the motion was approved <br />unamiously. <br />CONSIDEREATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LAKES ADDITION NO. 9 <br />FOR EL REHBEIN AND SON, INC., APPLICATION 88 -35. <br />In July the Planning and Zoning Board considered a <br />preliminary plat for Lakes Addition No. 9. The plat was <br />based on a concept plan submitted earlier showing division <br />of the land into 75 foot lots. The concept plan had been <br />submitted to beat the enactment of increased lot width <br />requirements by the board and the City Council. <br />At the July meeting however, the boardmembers found that the <br />preliminary plat submitted by the applicant did not meet the <br />city code requirements. After the meeting the city engineer <br />sent a letter to the applicant listing the needed changes. <br />The preliminary plat currently submitted for the boards <br />review has met those requirements. <br />After discussion a motion was made. <br />MOTION: Charles Prokop moved to recommend to the City <br />Council approval of the preliminary plat for Lakes Addition <br />#9, Application 88 -35 with the Stipulation that lot #2, <br />Block #3 be designated as outlot A, a 75 foot frontage width <br />be approved since the concept plat was approved before the <br />Page 6 <br />