Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD December 14, 1988 <br />2. <br />to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls. <br />That the plight of the landowner is due to <br />circumstances unique to his property not <br />created by the land owner. <br />3. That the hardship is not due to economic <br />considerations along and when a reasonable <br />use for the property exists under the terms <br />of the ordinance. <br />4. that granting the variance requested will <br />not confer on the applicant any special <br />priviledge that would be denied by this <br />Ordinance to other lands, structures, or <br />buildings in the same district. <br />5. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably <br />diminish or impair established property <br />values within the neighborhood. <br />6. That the proposed actions will be in keeping <br />with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />This property is unique, and could not be put to reasonable <br />use due to the shortness of the 40 acres. <br />This motion is contingent. upon Ms. Marier filing the <br />appropriate documents in order to substantiate the request <br />for a variance. The applicant has agreed to this. <br />Mr. Prokop seconded the motion, and was approved <br />unanimously. <br />ACCESSORY BUILDING AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE: <br />Ms. Nelson researched the accessory building ordinance of <br />three cities. <br />The City of Blaine allows 1200 S.F. of garage space which is <br />a combination of attached and detached garages or accessory <br />structures with a 200 S.F. additional shed or greenhouse. <br />This pertains to Single Family Zones. <br />Shoreview is similar, allowing 1500 S.F. in 3 buildings <br />including the attached garage. <br />Page 6 <br />