01/09/1985 P&Z Agenda & Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

1 1 1 91 Planning and Zoning Page Two January 9, 1985 Mr. Spetzman asked wfat recourse he would have. Mr. McLean reminded him that the P & Z Board is a recommending body and that the Council would make the final decision based upon this recommendation. Mr. Spetzman reminded the Board that he has sought legal counsel and has been told by three attorneys that the city's zoning of his property a couple of years ago, which caused him this problem was done so unconstitutionally and that he would continue his effort to allow his building. Metes and Bounds Subdivision - Donnell Realty Mr. Donald Nelson represented Donnell Realty in its application for a metes and bounds subdivision. Mr. McLean questioned Mr. Kluegel as to whether this application should be a metes and bounds subdivision or a plat. There was some discussion as to how park dedication charges are handled in either situation. Mr. McLean asked that Mr. Chapman advise. The Board felt that the package of information accompanying the appli- cation had insufficient information to warrant a recommendation to Council. Mr. Prokop moved to table the application by Donnell Realty for a metes and bounds subdivision until a complete package of information including the metes and bounds subdivision or plat question, drainage, frontage, legal descriptions, plan for maintenance, etc. is submitted. Mr. Doocy seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Rezone and Site and Building Plan - Bruce Hansen Mr. Bruce Hansen appeared before the Board representing his applica- tion for a rezone and site and building plan required in order for him to construct a hanger at the Seaplane Base. He noted that a portion' of his property is zoned GB and part R -2. Mr. McLean stated that there was insufficient information submitted with the package to consider the site and building plan. Mr. Cody moved to table Mr. Hansen's application for a rezone and site and building plan until receipt of further information with regard to the site and building plan. Mr. Prokop seconded the motion. Mr. Hansen asked that the Board at least consider the rezone due to the fact that if a recommendation could be made with regard to the rezone, then the Council's process of public hearings re- quired for approval could begin. The site and building plan he could resubmit with more complete information at the next meeting of the P & Z. The Council could act upon the site and building plan as soon as it is presented to them, without public hearings. This would speed up the process for Mr. Hansen. Mr. Prokop then withdrew his second to the motion, thus motion died.