Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD <br />January 14, 1987 <br />Page Three <br />MOTION: Mr. Cody moved to recommend to Council approval of the <br />application #86 -44, dated 12/10/86 from John Blomquist for a replat <br />from Arbor Lake to Otter Bay, as described within the application, <br />subject to resolution of the following issues: 1) satisfaction of <br />park dedication, 2) setbacks and frontages for each lot be determined per <br />ordinance requirements and shown on the plat drawing, 3) applicant <br />accept the "island" cul -de -sac recommendation, 4) jurisdiction of <br />County Road J be determined and plans for improvement arranged, 5) <br />RCWD review and approve the proposed replat, 6) soil tests and ele- <br />vations reviewed and approved by Building Official, and, 7) drainage <br />plan be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. Mrs. Nelson seconded <br />the motion which carried with Mr. McLean voting no. <br />ROSS' CORNER LIQUOR - REZONE AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN <br />Background on this issue: P & Z Board, at their 12/86 meeting con- <br />sidered this issue and a text amendment which would allow the plans <br />of Ross' Corner Liquor. The City Planner, at that meeting, offered <br />to work with the City Attorney and Council to arrive at a better <br />vehicle with which to resolve the problems presented. The City <br />Planner was asked to draft an amendment to the ordinance which would <br />create a new zoning classification with setback requirements and <br />parking requirements appropriate for the proposed site and building <br />plan. This amendment was drafted, considered by the Council on <br />1/12/87, given its first reading by the Council, and referred to the <br />P & Z Board for their review and recommendations. <br />The consensus of the Board was that the Council originated this amend- <br />ment without following the administrative procedures as outlined in <br />Section 5, Subd. 3 (1 - 9) of the Zoning Ordinance, wherein it is <br />noted that the P & Z Board review the amendment and make recommenda- <br />tion to the Council. Because the Council originated the amendment <br />and has already given it a first reading, the Board felt that it <br />would be "rubber stamped" regardless of the recommendations of the <br />P & Z Board. <br />When asked to comment, Mr. Johnson said that he would not comment on <br />the administrative procedure used, but he did state that from a <br />planning standpoint the "Central Business" district which would be <br />created by the amendment is similar to what is used in other communities <br />and that it would be beneficial for the City to create this district <br />not only for the Ross' Corner Liquor business but also for future <br />commercial growth within the City. <br />Mr. Cody said he would abstain from further consideration of the <br />amendment because he was adverse to the procedures taken in this <br />situation. <br />Mr. Bisel said that the Council took their actions in the interest <br />of time and genuinely requests the P & Z's review of the amendment <br />and is requesting a recommendation. <br />