03/12/1986 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD March 12, 1986 Page Four Mr. Schubert said his two -faced sign would be a "unipole" construc- tion, which takes up very little area and a business could use the property right up to the sign without hindrance. The face would change periodically, the sign would be externally lit, of steel structure and withstand a30 pounds per square foot windload. Mr. Kluegel said that the application meets or exceeds all ordin- ance requirements: 750' from nearest home, 750' radius from other advertising sign, 1200' from sign on the same side of the street, 20' setback from the street. Mr. Schubert said that Lino Lakes businesses are currently in- terested in leasing the signs. Mr. Doocy asked if the City benefits at all from the sign. Mr. Schubert said the only benefit is the advertising itself. The sign is planned to be erected when the frost goes out of the ground. MOTION: Mrs. Klaus moved to recommend to Council approval of the conditional use permit for Schubert Advertising, 2747 26th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN to place two advertising structures on property owned by Roger Action as set forth in the application dated 1/28/86, because the proposed conditional use permit has been recommended for approval by the City Planner and because the Building Official has stated that the ordinance will be met. Seconded by Mrs. Averbeck. Carried unanimously. Mr. Schubert was told that this request will go to the City Council on 3/24/86 for final approval with the afore - mentioned recommenda- tion. EMMETT SALBERG - Metes & Bounds Conveyance /House Move -In Mr. Salberg represented this application for a metes & bounds con- veyance. Mr. Kluegel stated that the application meets requirements of frontage and acreage size per ordinance. Mr. Johnson agreed. Mrs. Klaus asked whether three items, which she felt should be included when considering a metes & bounds conveyance are available - 1) list of name of adjacent landowners, 2) location of utilities on the property, 3) plan for future subdivision. Mr. Johnson did not feel in this instance that a plan for future subdivision was necessary. Mr. Salberg stated that there are no utilities on the property in question and that he thought there was only one land- owner which, according to ordinance, would need to be notified. MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved that the application by Emmett Salberg, 5926 Hobe Lane, White Bear, MN, dated 3/5/86 for a metes and bounds subdivision as proposed in the application be recommended to Council for approval since it is in compliance with the City Code and the Comprehensive Plan for the City. Before the Council considers the request, the adjacent landowners must be notified as specified in the ordinance. The balance of the property will remain farm land. Mrs. Klaus seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.