04/09/1986 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• PLANNING & ZONING BOARD April 9, 1986 Page Five MOTION: Mr. Cody moved to recommend to Council approval of a condi- tional use permit for land reclamation for William Boop, 8026 Rondeau Lake Drive West per his application number 86 -12 dated 3/27/86 with the following conditions: 1) The finished grading plan present no adverse situation to the neighboring lots (per the City Engineer), 2) The proper requirements are met through U.S. Army Corp of Engineer, DNR, and Rice Creek Watershed District. This approval would be granted due to the fact that Mr. Boop has demonstrated a hardship to the land as outlined in Section 4, Subd. 32 of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. McLean seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Mr. Boop was informed that he would need to appear before the April 28 Council meeting for final approval. - LOT PROVISIONS - NUMBER OF PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES PER LOT - ZACK JOHNSON Per P & Z's request, Mr. Johnson, in his March 6, 1986 memo (attached) redefined principal uses per lot. The Board discussed the memo agree- ing that this proposed change encompasses the wishes of the Board with regard to principal uses per lot. MOTION: Mr. McLean moved to recommend to Council adoption of an ordinance change, Section 4, Subd. 5, Lot Provisions, Number of III Principal Structures per Lot, as presented in Mr. Johnson's 3/6/86 memo. Mr. Cody seconded the motion which carried unanimously. - BUILDING STANDARDS - ZACK JOHNSON Mr. Johnson reported that in researching the area building standards in commercial and industrial districts, he and his associate, Mr. Wuornos have found that the two extremes are Lino Lakes (allowing pole buildings) and Bloomington (requiring reinforced concrete or steel buildings). Mr. Johnson felt that in order to put together a proposal to change the building standards he would need direction from the P & Z Board as to what particulars the Board was looking for. The consensus of tRie Board was that the surrounding communities should be checked and put together a proposal considering the aesthetics of the building, the tax base /benefit to the City and the longevity of the building, but not be as restrictive as the extreme Bloomington standard. Mr. Johnson agreed to bring this proposal to the next meeting. The Board felt that the Economic Development Committee should have input into these standards before a change is recommended. ,- OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. •