07/09/1986 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • PLANNING 8 ZONING BOARD July 9, 1986 Page Two NICKELSON PLUMBING 6 HEATING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EXTERIOR STORAGE AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW Mr. Nickelson appeared before the Board representing his application to build a pole building to house an office and warehouse for his plumbing business. He explained that he does a large percentage of his business for El Rehbein 8 Son and works in or near the Lino Lakes area. In discussion, the following particulars were outlined: The building will be pole -type construction with a concrete floor. - The drive is to be blacktopped. The only signage will be for identification. A letter from the County regarding the access is still forthcoming. The City Engineer in a 6/30/86 memo and the City Planner in a 7/1/86 memo outlined several areas of concern which needed further clarification before they could recommend approval. MOTION: Mrs. Klaus moved to table the application of Bob Nickelson, 21233 Olinda Trail North, New Scandia, dated 6/6/86 until such time that the City Engineer and City Planner's concerns have been satisfied and each has had the opportunity to make a recommendation to the Board. The applicant is also asked to present his request in a clear and concise manner. Motion seconded by Mr. Cody and carried unanimously. VART_ANCE TO SETBACK - JOHN GUSE Mr. Guse appeared before the Board representing his request for a variance to the setback requirement which would allow him to build an airplane hangar with a zero setback. Mr. Guse and Mr. Kluegel explained that the hardship in this case is three -fold -- the fact that the City, as part of the upcoming 4th Avenue improvement project has taken a 17' easement from Mr. Guse's property; the fact that the lot was initially undersized; and the fact that there is a swail through Mr. Guse's property which allows for drainage of his property and properties to the west. These circumstances create a problem in meeting the required setbacks. The Board questioned the applicant as to the possibility of different layouts or setbacks other than what Mr. Guse has proposed. Mr. Guse explained why each option, in his opinion, was not feasible. MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved to recommend to Council approval of application number 86 -22 from John Guse, 399 Thomas St.,