Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />December 10, 1986 Page 7 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD <br />amount of time and money was spent to develop a comp plan <br />amendment, only to have the Strategic Planning Workshop <br />attendees suggest such dramatic revisions. <br />MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved to accept the comp plan amendment <br />proposed by the task force (as outlined in City Planner's <br />12/3/86 memo) and the alternatives proposed by the Strategic <br />Planning Workshop (as outlined in City Planner's 12/9/86 <br />memo). Mr. McLean seconded the motion which carried <br />unanimously. <br />ROSS LIQUORS SITE AND BUILDING PLAN <br />Mr. Schumacher asked the Board to consider the site and <br />building plan of Ross Liquors (presented earlier this <br />evening) so that the applicant can receive the direction <br />necessary to revise the site and building plan. <br />Mr. Ross's engineering consultant presented the site and <br />building plan explaining that the applicant feels that, <br />even though several variances would be required in order to <br />approve the plan, the configuration presented is the most <br />logical and economical. <br />The Board reminded the applicant that even though the site <br />and building plan presented appears to be the most logical <br />and economical, it would require several variances and there <br />is criteria which must be met before variances can be <br />granted. The Board asked the applicant to present, at a <br />later meeting, a site and building plan consistent with the <br />zoning ordinance. They also suggested that the applicant be <br />prepared with one plan assuming approval of the comp plan <br />amendment under review and an alternative plan assuming <br />denial of the comp plan amendment. The engineering <br />consultant said that he felt he had the direction he needed <br />in order to do so. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />None. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />None. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 P.M. by unanimous vote. <br />Aye. <br />