05/09/1984 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• Planning and Zoning Board May 9, 1984 Page -6- Mrs. Klaus said she had reservations about the rezoning. Mrs. Klaus asked Mr. Cody why he felt this should be referred to the City Attorney. He said he does not know how much land is required to bring the lot into conformance and does not know whether or not the whole five acres situation must be conveyed or you can do this piecemeal. Mr. Cody moved the Planning and Zoning Board refer the question on the lot split variance to the City Attorney, Mr. Hawkins for an opinion as to what amount of land would be required to bring this lot split into conformance with the zoning ordinance and to direct the complete applic- ation including the rezoning, variance, the Amended Conditional Use Per- mit for the septic system and the Site & Building Plan review together with Mr. Shorts comments regarding this matter. Mr. Prokop seconded the motion. On the vote there were four (4) ayes and three (3) nays. The motion carried. Mr. Goldade instructed Mr. Kluegel to get the City Engineers review of the Site & Building Plan review. Mr. McLean asked that all the other information be in the packet. Mr. Cody asked Mr. Kluegel to put this item first on the June agenda and to allot at least ) hour to this subject. aMr. Doocy asked the applicant to be sure and redraw his plan to show the 35' rear set back instead of the 30' setback. Mr. Karth felt there was a discrepancy in the ordinance on this matter. Mr. McLean asked the City Attorney to comment on this matter as well. CLEMMENT SCHMITZ Mr.Schmidtz owns the triangle piece of property bordering on Rice Lake Estates, Lake Drive and Hodgson Road. When the present zoning ordinance was adopted his property was zoned General Bus4ness. Mr. Schmidtz feels he would have greater opportunity to sell this property if it were re- zoned to R -1. Mr. Kluegel explained that Mr. Schmidtz has been before the Planning and Zoning Board several times with various single family layouts. Mr. Schmidtz said as the property is presently zoned he has no need for municipal sewers but if it would be rezoned to R -1 he would be very in- terested in sewers. Mr. McLean asked Mr. Schmidtz if his question tonight is; would this Board think it would be feasible regarding an application for a rezone to R -1 for this piece from the GB and R -3? Mr. Schmidtz said, yes. Mr. McLean told Mr. Schmidtz after polling the members the consensus of the Board was to leave the zoning GB and R -3. The Board feels they are not being presented with the whole picture as to what is going on in the City. The Council minutes are abreivated and they are missing parts to the total picture. In the case of Mr. Schmidtz, he was asked by the City staff is he would be interested in municipal