03/14/1984 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• Planning & Zoning Board March 14, 1984 Page -2- Mr. Kluegel said kennels were not allowed in a R -1 area but Ms. Bucholz's lot is in an ER area. Mr. Prokop asked how do you handle substandard lots in an ER area. Mr. Kluegel said he has been checking this with the City Attorney and does not have his response as yet. Mr. Prokop felt this request should be tabled until this question is answered. Mr. Ostlie asked Ms. Bucholz what her time frame was. She said that her contract is void after 30 days. She has until April 30, 1984 to complete her contract. Mr. Goldade felt that the Task Force was aware that there were many sub- standard lots in the ER area, and the Board should follow the present ordinance. Mr. Goldade moved to recommend approval of a Dog Kennel License for Joanne Bucholz with the condition that there will be no more than three dogs and there will be no outside kennels built. Mr. Ostlie asked for a second to the motion. Mrs. Klaus said she was having a hard time because of the present plan to amend the ordinance to exclude dog kennels from the substandard lots 0 in the ER area. Mr. Ostlie asked for a second to the motion two more times. No one seconded the motion and the motion died. Mr. Prokop moved to table this application until the April Planning and Zoning Board meeting and recommended that Mr. Kluegel contact the City Attorney to ascertain the status of the Kennel License proposed amendment. Mr. Goldade seconded the motion. Motion declared passed. Mr. Ostlie explained to Ms. Bucholz that the Board will have a decision at the April Planning and Zoning Board meeting. PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE - Norbert Weber Mr. Weber had appeared at the February Planning and Zoning Board meeting with a preliminary plat for the west part of his land which is to be divided intd three lots. There had been a question as to whether or not Mr. Webers own residence would be required to be sewered. This question was referred to the City Attorney for his clarification. Mr. Hawkins has written a letter to the Planning and Zoning Board stating in his opinion Mr. Webers home would have to be connected to the sanitary sewer within one year as provided by the zoning ordinance. Mr. Weber has requested a variance to exempt his home from being required IIIto connect to the sanitary sewer. He explained he felt it was economically not feasible. Mr. Winner, Engineer with Milner Carley & Assoc. explained the revised ponding area and indicated the lot sizes conform to the City code. He