03/14/1984 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning and Zoning Board March 14, 1984 Page -7- The motion carried unanimiously. Mr. Goldade asked if Teddy Bear Hollow is operating under a Conditional Use Permit. It was noted the business was started when the area was zoned commercial and they would be grandfathered. Mr. Prokop asked Mr. Kluegel to supply Mr. Damon with a copy of Mr. Shorts letter in reply to rezoning the entire area to General Business. Mr. Goldade asked for an entire site plan and compliance with the ordinance regarding site and building plan approval. METES AND BOUNDS CONVEYANCE - Harold Hansen Mr. Marlin Hansen appeared before the Board representing his father Harold Hansen. Mr. Hansen was before the Board on February 8, 1984 to request a parcel of property smellerthan was required by ordinance be split from Mr. Harold Han - sens property to be added to Mr. Marlen Hansens property. The Board asked Mr. Hansen to comply with the ordinance and split off at least ten acres With at least 330 feet frontage. Mr. Kluegel explained Mr. Hansen has now provided the Board with a draw- ing of a parcel of 12.17 acres bordering on the entire cul -de -sac to be 410 split from Outlot B and to be added to his (Marlin Hansen's) property. Mrs. Klaus moved to recommend approval of a metes and bounds subdivision of Harold Hansen of 2020 Otter Lake Drive per survey attached to the app - lication of January 19, 1984, the reason being the subdivision conforms to the requirement of ten acres in the zoning ordinance. Mr. Prokop se- conded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Hansen was told this will be on the March 26, 1984 Council agenda. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Richard Kulkey - 780 -3443 Mr. Kulkey said he is presently looking at property at 405 Ash Street which contains a pole building. He is wond- ering if he can conduct his business of wire fabrication from this pole building. Mr. Kluegel noted that the property is located in the Rural District and the lot contains five acres, the pole building and a house. He also noted the ordinance does provide that in a Rural District a home occupat- ion can be conducted in the permitted accessory building providing the lot contains ten acres or more. The Board had a question as to whether the Rural District is considered a residential district. The zoning ordinance FI page 56 was referred to •and Mr. Ostlie asked for an opinion as to whether or not F(i) applies to Rural Districts. He asked for the purpose of home occupation is the Rural District considered to be also a residential district. Mr. Kttlkey answered several question regarding his business. Mr. Goldade