10/10/1984 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning and Zoning Board October 10, 1984 Page -3- • METES & BOUNDS CONVEYANCE - KEN ALBRECHT • • Mr. Albrecht appeared before the P & Z Board to request a metes and bounds conveyance to'add a piece of land belonging to Dennis Nelson to his land. Discussion followed with an outcome of the following motion. This additional land will be a buffer in rural zone. Mr. McLean moved to recommend to Council that they approve the metes and bounds conveyance of 165 feet by 2,650 feet from adjacent land of Dennis Nelson to Ken Albrecht. Since this is a ten -acre split and is allowed, there is no problem in this area, however, a variance is required because the frontage is less than the 330 feet required by ordinance. The new owner is also required to record his old property and new property as one parcel rather than two separate parcels. This will satisfy the ordinance. Motion seconded by Mr. Prokop. Motion carried. Mr. Albrecht was told that this item will appear on the October 22 Council agenda. REPLAT, REZONE - ULMER'S 4TH ADDITION Mr. Ulmer appeared before the P & Z Board to ask them to consider his replat of Ulmer's 4th addition and also to rezone the area due to the approval of Resolution 84 -25 by the Council with respect to the extension of sewer to the'area in question. He told the Board that his bank will not issue him a letter of credit for this project until his plat is approved. Mr. McLean informed Mr. Ulmer that Resolution 84 -25 has been approved subject to two contingencies which must be satisfied - those contin- gencies being letters of credit from the developers involved and mutually agreeable developers agreements between the City and the developers involved. Mr. McLean felt that the proper progression of events here would be 1) contingencies of Resolution 84 -25 must be •satisfied, 2) then the P & Z Board would consider a rezone for the area in question (which could easily be rezoned to R -1 with the definite extension of sewer into the area), and 3) then the P & Z Board could consider approval of the actual plat. Mr. Ulmer again mentioned that his bank needed the security of an approved plat before issuing the letter of credit. The P & Z Board realized the problem an& began to consider the proposed plat. The plat called for a predominantly single family home area. There were, however, a couple of areas in the perimeter of the plat which called for twin homes. There was some confusion as to the lot size for the twin homes; it was finally understood that each twinhome would be built in the center of a 90 foot frontage lot and after the twinhome was split down the middle, each owner would have a minimum of 45 foot frontage.