Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Board <br />January 11, 1984 <br />Page -5- <br />A map was shown indicating the existing towers in the metropolitan area <br />and the five major airports. <br />Mr. Goldade asked if the lighting would be similar to the tower near <br />Diversified Products near the intersection of 694 and 35W. No one was <br />familiar with this tower. <br />Mr. Ostlie asked if there is a problem with multiple towers in a relatively <br />small area. Mr. Fawler said thereis no problem with FMantenna. Mr. Ostlie <br />asked if other towers were planned for the same area. The answer was "no ". <br />Shoreview does impose limits of use on their Conditional Use Permits and <br />this City could do the same. <br />Mr. McLean asked when would this Board see proof that the FAA and FCC <br />are being dealt with. Mr. Nolan said he would keep the Board informed. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District application is being prepared and there will <br />be contact with the DNR and copies of correspondence will he forwarded to <br />the City. It is preferred that the City consider the application independ- <br />ent of what the FAA and FCC would do. Essentially the City requirements <br />will be the maximum of what is allowed in any circumstance. The FAA and <br />FCC will not seriously address the application unless they know the app- <br />lication has City approval. It can be a long and laborious process. <br />•lr. Doocy asked what the minimum land size requirement for the tower and <br />support buildings would be? Mr. Fawler said 32.9 acres. The plan for <br />the remaing 40+ acres is continued cultivation or if the City preferred <br />subdivision into ten acre parcels. <br />Mr. Prokop said he would like to see strobe lights in use. <br />Mr. Nolan noted this tower is a segmented tower and designed to fall <br />into itself in pieces if it fell. <br />Mrs. Klaus asked who will oversee the actual construction of the tower. Mr. <br />Nolan said the deign will have to be approved by the FCC and engineers <br />will inspect the construction progress. <br />Mr. Ostlie asked why would it be beneficial to locate a tower in Lino <br />Lakes? Mr. Nolan said Lino Lakes is centrally located in relation to <br />their market and the rural nature of the area and the distance from resid- <br />ential areas makes the area more appealing. Plus it is easily accessable <br />for maintenance. <br />Mr. Nolan asked for further direction from the Board. Mr. McLean asked for <br />copies of the Shoreview Conditional Use Permits on their towers from Mr. <br />Short, asked for information as to what this means for a tax base for the <br />City, what it means for future development near the tower, Rice Creek <br />approval and a document from the DNR. <br />Ilkt was noted that there is major residential development near the tower <br />in Shoreview and other parts of the metropolitan area. <br />Mr. Goldade asked what the life expectance of the tower is. Mr. Fawler <br />