06/13/1984 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning and Zoning Board June 13, 1984 41Kr. McLean said this approval is just for the land owned by Mr Grubbs. Mrs. laus said this would be pure "spot zoning ". Mr. Ostlie moved to extend the GB district to the boundary of State Highway 49. There was no second for this motin. On voting on the motion, motion carried with Mr. Cody voting nay. It was decided to consider the request for a Conditional Use Permit and the Site and Building Plan review after the rezone has been finalized. AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE AND BUILDING PLANS - Jim Spetzman This item is a continuation of the request from the May 9, 1984 meeting. Mr. Davidson, City Engineer was asked to give his recommendation and opinions and a letter was received dated May 22, 1984. City Attorney, Bill Hawkins had also submitted a letter dated June 4, 1984 stating this would indeed be a request for an Amended Conditional Use and Mr. Spetzman should comply with all the requirements of the zoning ordinance. Mr. Kluegel was asked to inform Mr. Davidson that the City has a geographical map of the entire city. Mr. Spetzman said there will be no exterior storage. The City Engineer had wspecified that the parking lot had to be surfaced. The existing driveway ill be part of the buffer. The south boundary will be 50% screened. • Mr. Cody moved to recommend to Council that the application of Mr. Jim Spetzman of 8121 Lake Drive, Lino Lakes for certain property located at 8121 Lake Drive, containing three acres and legally described as set forth on the rear page of his application for an amended Conditional Use Permit be approved that such amended Conditional Use Permit shall be conditioned on the following requirements: 1. that screening be provided in accordance with sub 16(b) dealing with buffers in a Light Industrial zone which would require that parking spots 5, 6, 7 and 22 be deleted on the site plan as provided to the Board. 2. that all parking surfaces contained on the description be of bituminous nature as set forth by Mr. Davidson in his report of May 22, 1984. 3. the existing driveway be part of the buffer in determining the screening requirements. Mr. Doocy seconded the motion. Motion declared passed. Mr. McLean said the Site and Building Plans shall follow the requirements of the ordinance.