My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/09/1983 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1983
>
03/09/1983 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2014 1:45:14 PM
Creation date
7/18/2014 1:53:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
03/09/1983
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. <br />sewer were to become available), and would allow only outdoor storage use or possibly <br />parking on that part of Molin Concrete's property over which it would lay. Land use <br />safety zone B, which is a short extension of land use safety zone A, limits development <br />to single - family homes on three -acre lots or other less intense uses. Again, this would <br />appear to be quite restrictive to lands which would propose to develop in the future. <br />In summary, if the city would like to implement land use safety zoning for airports, <br />and utilize these standards recommended by MnDOT, then it would appear that there <br />would be little or no impact on property owners affected by the Surfside Seaplane <br />airstrip, but will have some restrictive impact on property owners to the east and west <br />of Lino Air Park. Considering that the recommended standards would only be required <br />if those airports were to be open to the public, owned and and operated by a public <br />agency and were requesting money from MnDOT, it appears that the city may never <br />really have to adopt these standards. However, it is recommended that the city adopt <br />some standards to control land use around these airports in an effort to minimize or <br />eliminate any future conflicts between these existing uses and those uses which may <br />develop near them in the future. Therefore, I would recommend that the city adopt <br />some level of land use safety zoning and that the standards for those zones be <br />standards which the city can enforce and live with in the future. Those standards may <br />be somewhat less than the standards recommended by MnDOT. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.