03/09/1983 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning and Zoning Board March 9, 1983 Page -3- elchanged. Mr. Short noted that 50% is a standard figure used in other communities. Mr. McLean asked if there were any comments from the audience about the percentages. Mr. Spetzman of 8121 Lake Drive - Mr. Spetzman explained his property which was rezoned Light Industrial so that he could build and operate a transmission repair shop. Now the proposed zoning is residential. This means he cannot expand or rebuild if there was more than 50% damage to the shop building. He felt this was not fair and would like the same consideration as the Pizza Shop and Tire Shop just north of him received. Mr. Milt Jorgenson of 8221 Lake Drive - Mr. Jorgenson owns approximate nine acres and grows Christmas trees and cannot see why this area cannot remain as it was, commercial. Mrs. Roland Ford of 6074 Hodgson Road - Mr. and Mrs. Ford operate a tree removal service and wish their property to remain commercial. Mr. Wes Jensen of 6075 Hodgson - Mr. Jensen had all of his property rezoned commercial for a future shopping center. He wants to keep all his property zoned commercial. Mr. Short explained that the neighborhood classification for a shopping center would accomodate the area in red. If something bigger was to come to this area the remainder could be re- zoned at that time. Mr. McLean reminded the audience that this Board was only a recommending Board. Only the Council can make final decisions and the public will have a chance for more input at the public hearing. 41111r. Jorgenson was told his Christmas tree business will be grandfathered in. Mr. Short told Mr. Spetzman that the Board will look at his property further. f 40,9 lam, t -st 64-r"'- e—referred to kte t--_,. regarding the percentage of damage to non - conforming property. Mr. Goldade suggested eliminating the percentage entirely. Mr. Karth suggested 60 or 70 %. The concensus was to change the percentage to 75 %. >3. Residential Design Standards - The proposed ordinance contains definitions for a Manufact- ured Home District and a Manufactured Home Park District. In setting the design standards for what types of homes can occur in all other districts of Lino Lakes one of the requirements established was that no residential stucture shall have a width of less than 20 feet at its narrowest point. It was agreed to change this to "60% of the residential sturcture shall have a minimum width of 20 feet." The ordinance cannot say that manufactured housing is not allowed in the R -1 and R -2 districts. The above statement regarding the 20 foot minimum width will make it difficult for most manufactured housing to meet this requirement. % „4. Swimming Pools - In section D of the proposed equipment shall be at least 50 feet from adjacent agreed to change this to 35 feet from 50 feet. 5. Exterior Storage - Mr. Short felt the language a handout to the Board suggesting language dealing leted since this is covered in another ordinance. labeled non - residential. ordinance regarding any noise mechanical or nearby residential structures. It was in this area was to "slim ". He presented with Coats and unoccupied trailers be de- In section (2) and (3) this should he Illkt was decided that firewood if stacked would be a permissable item in section (1). Propane tanks were discussed and it was decided it would be difficult to require screening for this