02/22/1983 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. industrial development for the years beyond 2000 and to protect those areas from premature development by requiring a very large minimum lot size. This procedure would accomplish two things: 1) assure that the development which occurs there between now and the time that area receives sewer will be consistent with its ultimate land use, and 2) discourage development until that time. This would probably require creation of two new districts. 5. Retaining Lake Drive strip commercial zoning between I -35W and Lake Drive. There was sentiment expressed by the audience and by a member of the Task Force to allow the 300 -foot strip commercial to remain along this area of the city. This should be discussed. 6. Commercial uses on Lake Drive at Orange Street. The four small businesses in this small commercial node were interested in keeping their commercial zoning. 7. Proposed industrial zoning north of 77th Street. The proposed Zoning District Map indicates an extension of the Light Industrial District north of Molin Concrete to include approximately 20 acres north of 77th. Three property owners approached me with an interest in having that area zoned Expansion Residential. 8. Expansion Residential lot size. Some property owners within the proposed Expansion Residential District but near to or surrounded by existing one -acre subdivisions felt that the five -acre minimum lot size was excessive and should be reduced, at least in their case, to one acre. February 17, 1983 - Southwest Quadrant 9. Minimum frontage in ER District. One property owner expressed dissatisfaction with the 300 -foot minimum lot width and recommended that it be somewhat less (approximately 150 feet) instead. 10. Highway 49/85th Avenue commercial area. The individual who owns the property immediately north of the 49 Club indicated that he wanted the commercial zoning to continue all the way up to Rohavik Oaks Subdivision. There was also interest in continuing the commercial zoning east across Highway 49 to enlarge that commercial area on the east side of the highway as well. 11. Strip commercial zoning - Hodgson Road. Two property owners located within the existing 300 -foot strip commercial requested that their properties be continued as commercial rather than being rezoned to Expansion Residential. Those two property owners included the insurance agency to 6364 Hodgson Road. 12. Seaplane base. In what district should the seaplane base be listed as a permitted or conditional use. While there were many other comments and criticisms expressed during the four public meetings, those which I have chosen to list above were the ones which I feel should be discussed in greater detail. Pete Klugel has also prepared a list of issues which he would like to discuss with the Task Force.