Laserfiche WebLink
-1982 <br />Page Four <br />The meeting was reconvened and Mr. Schumacher reported on the <br />audit proposals. Mr. Reinert had called this date to give Mr. <br />Schumacher his input. Mr. Schumacher reported that he had talked <br />with the League and their recommendations is that once a selection <br />is made, the City should stay with that firm for about six years. <br />The City has been with Anfinson for six years and with the recent <br />loss of Mr. Gary Groueno there is no one left at that firm, with the <br />exception of Mr. Anfinson, who has worked on the City records during <br />an audit.. Mr. Grouen is now with Abdo, Abdo Eick and has an office <br />in Richfield and has presented the low bid for one year. It was <br />pointed out that the bid is different for 1983 and 1984. <br />It was pointed out that most of the other firms presented their <br />bids in the same manner. Mr. Schumacher pointed out an important <br />item is the content of the audit. <br />Mr. Reinert agreed. This is starting all over. He felt all the <br />proposals were good and in a couple of cases, there were some very <br />good suggestions, but he felt the firm of DeLaHunt offered the most <br />to the City. He felt the City would get more for their money from <br />this firm. <br />Mr. Schumacher agreed they had more experience. <br />Mr. Marier said that's the point - they are Auditors. <br />Mr. Reinert moved to engage the firm of DeLaHunt Voto Company for <br />the 1982 audit with the declared intent of this Council to retain <br />this firm for three years. Seconded by Mr. Marier. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />Mortgage Revenue Bonds <br />Mr. Schumacher noted that a letter from Mr. Bill Hawkins had been <br />received this date answering the Council's request for more infor- <br />mation on these bonds. The Council took time to read the letter. <br />Mr. Schumacher felt the letter summarized the law, noting that a <br />public hearing must be held. There are five developers interested <br />in this means of financing and are requesting 5/6 Million dollars. <br />Mr. Marier asked who the developers were and Mr. Schumacher listed <br />El Rehbein & Son, Glenn Rehbein, Ulmer's Const. Nelson Properties <br />and Schilling Const. Mr. Marier asked if this involved any new <br />plats and Mr. Karth said, No, this would be used on existing lots. <br />Mr. Marier asked about money in escrow and Mr. Karth said the package <br />pawn is paid for by the developers and they must also deposit a <br />percentage on the bonds. Mr. Marier asked what percentage for each? <br />is that part of the agreeement? Mr. Karth said, Yes, this is decided <br />before the bonds are sold. MR. Marier asked what happens if one of <br />the developers back out and Mr. Karth said the amount of money he <br />had requested is not sold or esle one of the other developers picks <br />up that amount. <br />