My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/15/1980 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1980
>
10/15/1980 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2022 3:13:17 PM
Creation date
7/21/2014 1:20:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
10/15/1980
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning and Zoning <br />October 15, 1980 <br />Mr. Schumacher pointed out that this is within a plat that has just been <br />approved and some of the items were provided within that plat. <br />There was some discussion on the type of planting that should be done in <br />relationship to the landscaping. This is required by the ordinance. <br />Mr. Bathke moved to recommend approval of this special use permit with the <br />stipulations that the buidling be moved, 8 additional parking spaces, and <br />moved the building so the exit is on a 90° basis from Diane Street. Seconded <br />by Mr. Doocy. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Under new business, the Centerville Comprehensive Plan review. Mr. Short <br />had submitted a letter with his review of this plan. The Planning and Zoning <br />Board members took time out to read Mr. Short's letter. <br />Mr. Schumacher asked if there were any negative statements that should be <br />brought to the attention of the Council. Mr. Reinert pointed out the comment <br />that the money from the sale of LaMotte Park should go toward the development <br />of Centerville's new proposed park. Mr. Schumacher said the Council had <br />discussed this at the last meeting. <br />Mr. Heath felt that since the same person assisted in the preparation of both <br />Comprehensive Plans, there should not be any areas of conflict. <br />Mr. Reinert questioned item 6 - Mr. Schumacher said this has not been dis- <br />cussed by the Council, but felt this could be an area of dissension. <br />Mr. Bathke moved to recommend concurrance with Mr. Short's comments on the <br />Centerville Comprehensive Plan with the exception of Item 6 on the last page, <br />which says, "that Lino Lakes should continue to consider Centerville as a <br />neighborhood service area for Eastern Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes should cooper- <br />ate and encourage commercial and other intense land use to develop in <br />Centerville's sewered area." Mr. Bathke felt this could be in conflict with <br />the Lino Lakes plans for industrial development. Seconded by Mr. Heath. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Heath moved to ajourn. Seconded by Mr. Bathke. Aye. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.