My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/16/1980 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1980
>
04/16/1980 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2014 4:45:38 PM
Creation date
7/21/2014 1:54:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
04/16/1980
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. Planning and Zoning Board <br />• April 16, 1980 <br />•Pae Five <br />• <br />Lot 5 is to be included in this also making the numbers lots 5 through <br />11. The general feeling of this Board was that they would prefer to <br />hold this number of lots to 15% of the overall plat. <br />Mr. Tramm presented a design of the proposed duplexes which are two floor <br />but side by side duplexes. <br />Mr. Bathke moved that Block 2, Lots 5 through 11 be recommneded for <br />rezoning to R2. Mr. Prokop added that one copy of the developer's <br />sketch be included in this proposal for Council consideration. Seconded <br />by Mr. Johnson. Motion delcared passed. <br />The lot split for Mrs. McClean was considered. The representative said <br />he had called a surveyor and it had been suggested, that in order to <br />save money, they felt that an indication of whether this lot split <br />would be allowed would be advisable before the actual work is done. <br />This lot is a corner lot facing Sunrise Avenue with the side street <br />being Fairmont. This lot contains approximately one acre and has one <br />house on the lot at this time. This type of split has been allowed in <br />this area in the past. <br />The general consensus of the Board was that this would be allowed. The <br />representative was advised to proceed with the variances for this split. <br />The next item to be considered was a request from Mr. & Mrs. Illg for the <br />placement of a trailer on private property located along Pine Street. <br />Mr. Illg owns 5 acres of land at that location, Mr. Schumacher presented <br />the Council's request that this be submitted as a special use permit. <br />The fee has been paid, pictures of the trailer are attached. Mr. <br />Schumacher reminded the Board that Ordinance 6Q allows Moble homes <br />in a mobile home park only. <br />The legality of this was discussed.. It was felt that if this is allowed <br />it would almostVimpossible to disallow the next request for the same <br />thing. Mr. Johnson felt this was creating an ongoing problem. <br />Mrs. Illg was asking for permission to keep the mobile home on that <br />property for at least five years. Mr. Johnson felt this would open the <br />door for many more requests of this same nature and this Board would find <br />it hard to deny these requests. <br />Mr. Barthke felt this Board was being asked to make a concession due to <br />the economy and he flet this is something all persons are facing the <br />same problem/ This City's Ordinance states that mobile homes must.'be <br />placed in a mobile home park. He felt this family was not being placed <br />in a position any different than many other mobile home owners. Mr. <br />0 Johnson felt this could lead to a city of temporary homes. <br />Mr. Bathke moved to recommeded to the Council that this special use <br />permit application be denied. Seconded by Mrs Johnson. The motion <br />declared passed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.