03/19/1980 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Plamning and Zoning Board March 19, 1980 Page Four the County requires an extra 27' for future needs - this has been included. The set back line of 30' is not on the plat at this time. Mr. Schumacher said a more detailed drainage plan will be necessary to present to the Rice Creek Watershed Board. There was discussion on the location of the rear lot line - it would appear that this line is located too far to the South. After consulting the minutes, it was found this line is correct. Mr. Tschida reiterated that the items that must be shown on the plat is the drainage easements and the set back lines. Mr. Schumacher continued to note that he has complied with all other requirements and would recommend this be approved with the above additions. There was discussion of the extra 27' feet required by the County. This land is part of the plat but remains in the ownership of the developer. If, some time in the future, it is needed for expansion of Main Street, then it would have to be purchased from the owner. The access to Main Stree /would be through a common driveway to two of the lots and one driveway to the remaining lot. She special use permit application of Molin Concrete was considered. Mr. chumacher said the plans have been submitted to Rice Creek Watershed Board. The 15' setback from the cemetary was questioned. He felt that this setback will need to be discussed and decided by this Board. Mr. Schumacher discussed the screening on the West. He felt this should also be applied. The building inspector had no problem with the plans. Mr. Molin was asked what he felt was the least amount of footage he could have as a side yard set back. Mr. Molin said he would like to stay as close to the line as possible - due to the cost of land. This building would house the maintenace shop and a portion would be leased the building is 160'x 50'. The leased area would be for storage. Mr. Reinert asked Mr. Schumacher and Mr. Kluegel to prepared a recommenda- tion in reference to the side yard set back. The general concensus of the Board members present was there is no major problem with this proposal. Mr. Petersen's request was considered. Mr. Schumacher said he had re- searched this request and it does conform to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 110r. Petersen's idea is to cut a street back approximately 200' feet to solate the commercial area from the residential area. Mr. Petersen was asked if he would consider multi - family dwellings in that area and he said he had no specific plans for the area. The only commercial type of business he would consider would be professional offices of some sort.