My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/05/2001 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2001 Park Board Packets
>
03/05/2001 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 3:03:40 PM
Creation date
7/23/2014 9:14:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
03/05/2001
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The charge of $1,956 dollars per residential unit is the amount of money that will need <br />• to be generated to complete 50% of the planned park and trail system for Lino Lakes, <br />based upon implementation of the plan with the lands and facilities described in Exhibit <br />D, which is based upon the Comprehensive Park and Trail Plan. The $1,956 dollar <br />figure takes into account the park service areas (% of park impact associated with new <br />vs. existing development), park and trail impacts, projected costs for the park and trail <br />system, future population and household projections and is therefore our best estimate <br />of park impact per unit. The information shown in Table 7 indicates the method by <br />which the residential unit fee was derived. <br />• <br />Table 7 <br />Park Cost per Residential Unit Based Upon Total Projected <br />Park System Cost (at full development) <br />Total Lino Lakes Persons per <br />Saturation Population Household <br />30,000 - 2.7 = 11,111 Total Households /Buildout <br />- 5,255 - Existing Households <br />5,856 Future Households <br />11,454,700 (Total Future Park Cost) _ 5,856 (FutureHHouseholds) = $1,956 (park cost <br />per unit) <br />'' <br />COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS <br />Minnesota Statutes and recent case law have identified that Cities must now be able to <br />specifically articulate and justify dedication requirements on a project -by- project basis. <br />Cities have the burden of determining that the park dedication requirement is related to <br />the park benefit that will be derived due to the development. Individualized <br />determinations must be made for each project and the City has the responsibility to <br />demonstrate that there is a reasonable relationship between the dedication requirement <br />and the park impact generated by the development. <br />The current commercial and industrial land dedication requirements of the City are at <br />issue with the case law and opinion of the City Attorney. There is no question that <br />many communities charge park dedication for commercial and industrial uses. At issue <br />is that there appears to be no rational basis for the dedication. Several sources were <br />contacted to locate studies or guidelines related to the impact commercial and industrial <br />land uses have on park and trail systems. The League of Minnesota Cities, National <br />Recreation and Parks Association, and the American Planning Association were <br />contacted with regard to this matter and none of the agencies were able to provide <br />documentation on the relationship of these uses to parks and trails. <br />11 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.