My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/07/2001 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2001 Park Board Packets
>
05/07/2001 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 2:57:00 PM
Creation date
7/23/2014 9:50:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
05/07/2001
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• including existing and future acres, facilities and values are also identified. City Staff <br />provided the list of facilities and corresponding costs. Trail values were determined <br />based upon a rate of $15.00 per lineal foot for park and transportation trails and $1.00 <br />per lineal foot for bike trails. The existing City park and trail system is valued at about <br />$6,471,816 dollars. To complete the system per the Comprehensive Park and Trail <br />Plan, an additional $14,362,583 of land, facilities and trails will be needed. The <br />$14,362,583 dollar future system cost includes costs to improve the new community <br />athletic complex with the premium level package estimated at $6,965,373 dollars. <br />Table 5 illustrates the value of the existing and proposed park system identified above. <br />• <br />• <br />Table 5 <br />PARK SYSTEM VALUE <br />Total Park <br />System Value <br />Value of Existing Park <br />Facilities <br />% of <br />Total <br />Value /Cost of Future <br />Park Facilities <br />% of <br />Total <br />$20,834,399 <br />$6,471,816 <br />31% <br />$14,362,583 <br />69% <br />Part of the park system analysis included a land use review to determine the service <br />areas for the existing parks and to identify the proportion of existing and future <br />development that will impact the system. Many of the existing parks are located in <br />areas of the community where future development will occur and as such, a proportion <br />of the park infrastructure should be borne by new development. In fully developed <br />areas, improvements to existing parks should be borne by current residents within the <br />service area of the specific facility. Exhibit D, Lino Lakes Parks/Trails Chart indicates <br />the percentage of each planned park service area that existing and future development <br />will impact. Table 3 indicated that the current park system is and rich and that the City <br />has acquired more land than is needed to serve the existing population (based upon the <br />National Recreation and Parks Association guidelines). However it is important to note <br />that the NRPA standards are guidelines only and that parkland and facilities need to be <br />community specific. <br />The current City population of 15,053 residents and 5,255 households is approximately <br />50% of the projected saturation population of 30,000 people. Table 5 illustrates that the <br />existing population is underserved in relation to the available and planned park and trail <br />facilities. For an equitable distribution of impact, the total park and trail system cost <br />should be distributed on a 50/50% basis between existing and future development as <br />illustrated in Table 6. <br />Table 6 <br />PARK SYSTEM COSTS BY SERVICE AREAS <br />Total Park and <br />Trail System Cost <br />50% of Total <br />System Cost <br />Existing Development <br />Future <br />Development <br />$20,834,399 <br />$10,417,200 <br />6,471,816 (Value of Existing System) <br />+ 3,943,384 (Value to meet 50% of Cost) <br />$10,417,200 <br />$10,417,200 <br />9 <br />Lino Lakes <br />Park Dedication Analysis <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.