My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/07/2001 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2001 Park Board Packets
>
05/07/2001 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 2:57:00 PM
Creation date
7/23/2014 9:50:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
05/07/2001
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Park Board Meeting - April 2, 2001 <br />Minutes <br />huge undertaking. The process would include having 8 -10 area <br />volunteers to form a committee to make the referendum work and <br />make people aware of it. <br />Pat stated the Park Board needs to contact people who have a big <br />interest in the complex as well as residents. <br />Bill inquired about the design cost estimate and asked if the <br />City needs a better one. Rick advised the City does have an <br />accurate costs estimate for the athletic complex. The question <br />will be what else should be included in the referendum. <br />Pat stated the City will need a consultant to provide that <br />information. <br />Chris asked about the difference in the estimated annual tax <br />impact for November 1997 and February 2000. Rick advised the <br />difference comes from the increase in total market value of <br />commercial, industrial, and residential. <br />Chris suggested the estimated annual tax impact for the future be <br />include in the information that is given to residents. She asked <br />how many key people will be need for the committees. Rick <br />advised 8 -10 area volunteers will be needed. <br />Pam added that the volunteers need to represent a broad spectrum <br />of the population. <br />Rick advised an update will be given at the June meeting. <br />Pat asked what kind of input the Council will expect from the <br />Park Board. <br />Chair Lindy stated he believes the Council will rely on the Park <br />Board completely. The Council is sure they want to pursue the <br />referendum if it is feasible that it will pass. <br />Rick stated he has provided the Council with information <br />regarding a referendum. He stated he is not sure there is <br />anything else the Park Board can do at this point. The City <br />Council needs to look at the "big picture" and determine if this <br />is the right time to pursue a referendum. <br />Chair Lindy stated he does not believe the Council would have <br />purchased the property if they did not have the goal of <br />completing the project. The Council is aware of the referendum <br />process. They want to be reasonably sure it will pass. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.