My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/01/2001 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2001 Park Board Packets
>
10/01/2001 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 2:48:42 PM
Creation date
7/23/2014 11:01:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
10/01/2001
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sue Walseth 1 <br />History of Trail Access to Birch Park <br />•1/12/94 Transcribed Planning & Zoning Board Minutes from Audio CassetteTapes: <br />(The Whitcomb's, original owners of Trappers' Crossing, were in the audience.) <br />Chuck Seykora: "I am an attorney from Coon Rapids. I am here representing the Whitcomb's, who <br />are the owners of this particular piece of property. The Whitcomb's felt a little uncomfortable, in <br />speaking in a public forum. so they asked that I present their views for you today. Naturally, they are <br />supporting the plan that is proposed by Hokanson Development. They feel that it is a fair plan, and <br />what they are offering to do. ...The Whitcomb's do have 125 acres. As you can see from the wetland <br />delineations that came down, over 55 acres of that property is essentially not developable property. All <br />the property on the west side has so much wetlands that you are not going to develop it into a plat." <br />5/4/94 Transcribed Park Board Minutes from Audio CassetteTapes: <br />Marty Asleson (Park Board Director in 1994): "In trying to provide access to Birch Park , a <br />boardwalk is being recommended from the development. It is all wetland between the park and the <br />development. There is 250 feet of wetlands and a creek to cross. The (county) ditch is a vertical wall <br />ditch. It's very deep in spots, about 4 -5 feet. It is a flowing ditch and in the wintertime, freezes on top, <br />and still flows. It is a very hazardous situation. The park area is attractive for children and adults. They <br />will want to go there, and cross people's backyards to get there, with or without the bridge in place. <br />We have to provide an access." <br />Kirk Corson (representative for Hokanson Development of Trappers' Crossing): "The area north <br />of the development is not owned by us. We will need permission of the people (Whitcomb's) who own <br />that land to cross it. This will have an impact on it. If you put an easement on it, the owner will be <br />liable, if someone is injured. The 200 -plus feet of boardwalk will cost about $75/ft. — for a total of <br />$20,000 to $25,000 to cross over. We are dedicating over $75,000. The hydrologist will recommend <br />IllOtwo large box culverts, similar to what was done under Birch Street, to handle the capacity of the 100 - <br />year flood. It is an amenity for the development to have access to this park." <br />Jeanne C. (daughter of the Whitcomb's): "You bought Birch Park land from us. If you require <br />more, why not buy more land that is attached to it? You previously bought 1 1/2 acres — and 4 acres <br />before that. I don't want to be landlocked. We still have 38 acres over here. A good 25 of that is total <br />swamp. There are 3 high knolls that can be developed eventually over there. We want to do something <br />down there — or sell it to the city f o r a park or bird sanctuary, or whatever you w a n t to do with it." ... . <br />. I am advantageously looking for people to buy it. Maybe someone wants to buy that whole 38 acres, <br />and maybe have one home on it. But I don't want any liability of a boardwalk. If that is the case, I <br />want an indemnification agreement. I really do." <br />Kirk Corson: "If you still have a park requirement, you can make the whole area as a park, if you <br />desire." <br />Jeanne C.: "There is nothing that we can do with the majority of it, but there are 38 acres with 3 high <br />knolls. If someone wants to build a nice house, or put a couple of horses on it, it would be perfect.. . <br />Could the answer be that the city buy the rest of that — up to the park? For the park? So it makes the <br />park bigger, and it is part of the city? You need another 4 acres or more of usable land. Could you have <br />a Nature Center? On usable land ?" <br />Kirk Corson: "Maybe we could use that $76,000 to build something across ?" <br />Marty Asleson: "It is a 4 -foot wide ditch. It is a running ditch. And it is 4 -feet deep... The Park <br />Board generally doesn't buy wetland. I don't know what the value would be — wetland — maybe <br />$500 /acre? And appraise it at recreation value, instead of buildable value. There is some upland value <br />as well." <br />•Jeanne C.: "I don't want the easement across there. If you are willing to buy it at the "swamp price" <br />(laughs) ... I don't want the responsibility or liability. I don't want to be landlocked.... Would you <br />have someone appraise it ?" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.