My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/04/2002 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2002 Park Board Packets
>
11/04/2002 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2014 1:11:40 PM
Creation date
7/23/2014 12:42:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
11/04/2002
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Park Board Meeting - August 5, 2002 <br />Minutes <br />Rick added the Environmental Board reviewed the project last week <br />and the Planning and Zoning Board will be reviewing it on August <br />14, 2002. <br />Mr. John Johnson, Engineer for Gary Uhde, came forward and <br />reviewed the preliminary plat noting the proposed location of <br />Carl Street. The proposed location has caused a lot of <br />discussion. It was determined that Carl Street will be built on <br />the indicated location on the current map. <br />Mr. Johnson advised a traffic report has been completed that does <br />show other options for the roadway. If the location is changed, <br />the trail location will also be affected. He noted the total <br />upland park area is 8.46 acres, over 5 acres of wetland and <br />available open space. He also reviewed the park dedication <br />requirements for the project. He indicated Mr. Uhde would like <br />to create the park area as soon as possible and a recommendation <br />needs to be made to the Planning and Zoning Board and the City <br />Council. <br />Chair Lindy asked if the intent of the park area was a linear <br />type park. Rick advised the intent was to have a larger park <br />area to accommodate substantial park amenities. <br />Mr. Johnson stated there is a greenway element that blends into <br />the project. Earlier discussions did include linear greenways <br />but staff did indicate the active park should be in one area. <br />Chair Lindy noted in the original discussions did include the <br />difficulty of getting around the wetlands. <br />Mr. Johnson referred to the map and pointed out the brown dotted <br />line noting there is space there. The wetland there cannot be <br />defined. That area needs to be mitigated but there needs to be a <br />connection to the southern piece of the property. The two cul- <br />de -sacs do connect with a trail. There was concern by the Air <br />Park regarding the location of the trail. <br />Chair Lindy stated the upland park area has notions of wetland <br />also. He asked if the green area on the map is upland. <br />Mr. Johnson stated there is a large area that is wetland that <br />needs to be restored in another location. The green area will <br />become entirely upland. <br />Rick stated the city needs to get a minimum of 4 -5 acres of <br />contiguous upland that is buildable for the park area. <br />• Mr. Johnson stated the developer understands that and he believes <br />that will happen with the current plan. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.