My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/06/2003 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2003 Park Board Packets
>
10/06/2003 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2014 12:58:11 PM
Creation date
7/24/2014 9:22:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
10/06/2003
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Park Board Meeting - August 4, 2003 <br />Minutes <br />Mr. Schlenk came forward and stated a cost estimate was prepared <br />for the park area. He indicated he would like credit for the <br />park development. He asked the Park Board to consider the park <br />area to be deemed public. <br />Acting Chair Taschuk asked why the proposed private park area has <br />now changed to a public park area. Mr. Schlenk advised there was <br />miscommunication with his development team. He has been advised <br />that the park area can be public. He stated the park area being <br />public would also help the City with the issue of park credit. <br />Acting Chair Taschuk asked for a current layout of the plan. Mr. <br />Schlenk presented the current plan noting the 1.2 acre park area <br />and trail locations. He reviewed the site features that include <br />park benches, tables and play structure. <br />Paul stated he is very disappointed with the plan. He stated <br />proposing that the park area be public is a step in the right <br />direction. However, he does not feel the park is a good value <br />for the City. The park area does not have good accesses for the <br />public. Also, the City can not accommodate the 150 homes with a <br />cash dedication of $82,000. <br />Acting Chair Taschuk agreed and indicated she is also concerned <br />that the park area is surrounded by townhomes. Access is also an <br />issue. She stated she is not comfortable with the park area <br />being public due to the way it is laid out. <br />Katie stated she believes the development would be more <br />attractive to buyers if the park area stays private. <br />Mr. Schlenk stated the cost estimate for the park is very <br />accurate. <br />Paul stated he is concerned that after the park is built, the <br />City only has $82,000 in cash dedication. He stated that is not <br />a good value for the City. <br />Rick stated that typically neighborhood parks service residents <br />within a quarter to a half mile of the park area. He stated he <br />is hesitant about the layout of the plan. He stated it is <br />difficult to access the park area and it is surrounded by <br />townhomes. The plan does provide an extensive trail system that <br />is very costly. He stated he would prefer to look at a larger <br />area if the intent is a public park. If the park is to be deemed <br />public, the park should go through the master planning process. <br />Mr. Schlenk stated that in terms of public access, all of the <br />surrounding streets are public and parking can be provided. He <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.