My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/05/2000 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2000 Park Board Packets
>
06/05/2000 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2014 12:57:10 PM
Creation date
7/24/2014 9:48:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
06/05/2000
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 13, 2000 <br />Council Member Carlson moved to adopt Resolution No. 00 — 27, listing the following findings of <br />fact: <br />1. Section 2 Subd. 2.B.7 of the City's zoning ordinance provides standards for all <br />conditional uses permits. <br />2. Section 5, Subd. 2.H.5. of the zoning ordinance provides additional criteria for a <br />conditional use permit for churches in the R -X zoning district. <br />3. The applicant agreed to several extensions of the review period according to law. <br />4. The revised application submitted February 7, 2000, was not complete, as stated in the <br />staff report. <br />5. The applicant requested as decision by the City Council on the project at the February <br />28, 2000, meeting. <br />6. The proposed phase one building footprint is 26,01 <br />height would be 30 ft. <br />7. Number of parking spaces (the number erified). <br />and the building <br />• <br />8. A majority of the City Council do that the project as submitted meets the • <br />standards for a conditional , ted in Section 2 Subd. 2.B.7. of the zoning <br />ordinance. Specificall <br />Subd. 2 that e project must be "harmonious with the general and <br />applicable s la�snd policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this <br />ordina . " <br />Sec. 2 S .7.c. states that the project must be "designed, constructed, operated, <br />and main ned so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing <br />and/or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential <br />character of that area." <br />In the view of two (2) of the four (4) Council Members, the size of the building and the <br />extent of the project relative to the site are not harmonious with the rural character of <br />the neighborhood, and would change the essential character of the area, which is <br />guided to remain rural in the City's existing comprehensive plan and the draft new <br />plan. <br />Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. <br />Council Member O'Donnell clarified that a yea vote supports the findings of fact, not necessarily <br />agreeing with the findings. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.