My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/03/2000 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2000 Park Board Packets
>
04/03/2000 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2014 12:47:45 PM
Creation date
7/24/2014 10:22:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
04/03/2000
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• results of the voting were shared (see paragraph 2). Why weren't the two tied proposals <br />placed on the table during the Monday meeting to be discussed and then to be voted on? <br />• <br />fi �esS <br />(te- <br />14 \Z) * <br />6 <br />te�"" • Consider picnic tables instead of benches. <br />Mr. beGardner has set up a meeting with the Game Time vendor for Wednesday, March 22 <br />at 3:30 p.m. This is short notice for all of us and not a good time of the day. However, I <br />hope a good number of people from the neighborhood can come and give their input. <br />Hopefully, we can change the plans to be safer and have a variety of components for kids of <br />all ages available. <br />I have obtained a couple of Game Time vendor catalogs and have them available if you are <br />interested in looking at them. By the way, the 5 original playground proposals can still be <br />viewed. They are at the Parks and Recreation dept at City Hall. Just ask the receptionist to <br />bring them out. <br />Below are some recommendations: <br />• Consider having one structure, which is safe for all ages. It will be difficult to keep <br />younger children ages 3 -5 off the main structure. <br />• To satisfy the older children consider components like rings, overhead ladders and a <br />space shuttle to be incorporated into the main structure. These components can be <br />reached by children old enough to use them. <br />• <br />Consider removing some of the climbing components that require an opening in the <br />railing system. Some of these are high up. We recommend choosing climbing <br />components that are safer and lower to the ground to prevent falls from high <br />places. For example, a mega rock or lily pad link could be used instead. <br />• Consider putting double slides in place of single slides. <br />• Consider having some crawling tubes and play panels in the main play structure. <br />• The present proposal has one Springer toy. Please consider a structure that will <br />satisfy a multiple of kids such as a Merry -go- round. <br />• In order to reach out to the teenagers /adults in the neighborhood, please consider <br />the court basketball court at this time. <br />• <br />These are some of the recommendations that I am going to share with the Game Time <br />vendor and Mr. Oe6ardner at this Wednesday's meeting. I feel with these recommendations <br />we can design a structure that is safe and appealing for a wide age range. I believe this will <br />incorporate what was desirable about the Miracle Options and the Game Time options into <br />one play area. If you are unable to come to the meeting but agree with these <br />recommendations, please feel free to sign your name/address /phone #. This will give Mr. <br />OeGardner a good idea of what Brandywood residents desire for their park. <br />� I A- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.