02/07/2000 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 25, 1999 The City Attorney advised a five -(5) page summary of the project and settlement was distributed to Council. He stated he believes the City has lived up to the settlement in full. He advised no further discussion or negotiating occur because of the possibility of further litigation. The City is bound by the terms of the settlement. Mr. Peak thanked the City for completing most of the terms of the settlement. He stated he believes the settlement has not yet been complied with regarding the island. He indicated it should not be necessary to bring the issue back to court. Mr. Vaughan distributed pictures of the island to Council Members. The City Attorney advised the settlement is a court- sanctioned settlement. The court is who should determine whether compliance has occurred. Another trial would not be necessary. This ordinance only has to do with the conveyance of property. He advised the Council approve the second reading. Council Member Lyden moved to table Ordinance No. 21 - 99 until th ber 8, 1999, Council meeting. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Council Member Lyden indicated he would like to read the s le ment. Council Member Bergeson added that tabling the ' u no harm. Mayor Sullivan advised that any City cont ghan be handled by the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Vaughan entered into t otape of the island and review of the last Council meeting. PUBLIC HEARING, ADING, Ordinance No. 17 - 99, Easement Vacation, Oak Brook Peninsula, John owell (4/5 Vote Required) - Staff requested the public hearing be continued until November 8, 1999. A recommendation on this matter from the Rice Creek Watershed District is required before City staff is able to make a recommendation. Council Member Dahl excused herself from the meeting at 7:24 p.m. Council Member Bergeson moved to continue the public hearing to the November 8, 1999, City Council meeting. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Minor Subdivision, 261 & 271 Elm Street, Johnson/Killey, Mary Kay Wyland (3/5 Vote Required) - Staff advised Mr. and Mrs. Johnson currently own the property at 261 Elm Street which consists of a 108' x 208' parcel containing their home and a 56' x 216' parcel to the north of their home. They would like to transfer the east 56' x 108' of this parcel to 6