My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/01/1999 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
1999 Park Board Packets
>
11/01/1999 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2014 2:33:54 PM
Creation date
7/24/2014 12:17:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
11/01/1999
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 9, 1999 <br />Hydric soils and wetlands were identified by using a combination of several sources' <br />commonly used for long -range planning purposes. Discussion followed regarding how <br />much of the hydric soils should be included in the MUSA. The process used to determine <br />the amount of hydric soils to be included in the MUSA is standard practice and staff <br />recommended that Council accept Mr. Brixius' analysis. <br />Council Member Lyden suggested that 50% of the identified hydric soils be added to the <br />MUSA now as buildable soils. This would increase the buildable MUSA numbers now <br />but decrease the buildable MUSA numbers needed for 2010 and 2020. Council Member <br />Bergeson felt that the Council should not be dictating what % to use because it is an <br />engineering issue. <br />Staff was directed to work with Mr. Brixius to determine how much of the hydric soils <br />can be built on. This information will be available at the next work session. <br />CLEARWATER CREEK, 3RD, DISCUSS DEVELOPMENT <br />OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN, JEFF SMYSER <br />One of the conditions for approval of Clearwater Creek, <br />space management plan be part of the development a <br />reviewed by and receive approval from the Cit i . <br />CT AND <br />as that the open <br />t the contract be <br />The City uses a "boilerplate" develop • � • r Clearwater Creek, 3rd, staff used <br />this development contract format • 'T:! ges to reflect the conditions for approval <br />and items in the draft open sp ent lan. The developer and the City will <br />prepare test sites to lean h • . • e esto - natural features in the area. After specific <br />areas of soil removal an : ti • learing are determined, costs will be determined <br />and negotiations •cc garding how much is a reasonable amount of work <br />Mayor Sullivan not " a some areas might need more than just seeding. She suggested <br />when 20 acres or mo are involved, staff should contact the DNR. They have a group <br />that can be of assistance in this area. <br />Staff noted that the development agreement going before Council on Monday evening is <br />for the 1st phase of Clearwater Creek, 3rd. This encompasses approximately one -half of <br />the entire subdivision. Staff was directed to include the entire subdivision when <br />developing a plan to return some areas to its original natural state. <br />The tree replacement plan was briefly discussed. Staff noted that a tree preservation plan <br />is standard in all development agreements. This is also the developers responsibility. <br />This matter is on the June 14th Council agenda. <br />PAGE 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.