Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 11, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />V. OPEN MIKE <br />No one was present for open mike. <br />VI ACTION ITEMS <br />A. PUBLIC HEARING, Majestic Pines Community Church, 16XX Centerville <br />Road, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review <br />Staff advised there are a number of issues that have not been resolved on this project. <br />Staff has not prepared a full report because the site plan is being revised. The review <br />deadline has been extended in accordance with state law and the applicant has been <br />informed that staff cannot recommend approval at this time. <br />Staff recommended the public hearing be opened and continued to the September 8, <br />1999, Planning & Zoning Board meeting. <br />Acting Chair Lane declared the public hearing open at 6:36 p.m. <br />Mr. Dennis Moravec, 1648 Holly Drive, came forward and stated his concerns regarding <br />the project include the sheer size of the project, building materials, lighting, additional <br />traffic, water run -off, and usage of the building. He stated more detail is needed <br />regarding the project. He added there is the potential for three homes to be built on the <br />parcel which would therefore add to the tax roll. He asked the Board to deny the rezone. <br />Mr. Smyser advised the project does not include a rezone. The project involves a <br />conditional use permit only. A conditional use permit allows for uses if a project meets <br />the specific conditions in the ordinance. <br />Mr. Moravec asked about the process used to listen to resident's concerns about a project. <br />Many residents feel this project exceeds the bounds of conditional use. <br />Mr. Terry Johnson, 987 Maple Street, stated a conditional use permit was approved eight <br />years ago for a project down the street from his home. He stated the owner is in violation <br />of the conditions. <br />Ms. Theresa Johnson, 987 Maple Street, stated four conditions have not been met on that <br />particular conditional use permit. She asked who is in charge of the follow up to insure <br />the church meets their conditions. <br />Mr. Smyser advised that City staff, City Boards, and the City Council is responsible for <br />the follow up on complying with conditions of approval. <br />Mr. Dunn stated the Board is at a disadvantage because they have no details regarding the <br />project. The Board cannot react to the resident's comments at this time. He noted that the <br />• <br />