Laserfiche WebLink
Technical Notes <br />1 2 3 4 5 6 7 <br />CUMULATIVE RAINFALL, IN CENTIMETERS <br />Figure 108.1: Cumulative Rainfall Versus <br />Runoff Coefficients for Different Lawn Age <br />Groups <br />(0.05 to 0.15 gm/cc) when this specialized equipment <br />was used at several Swedish construction sites, com- <br />ared to traditional construction equipment. Even so, <br />specialized construction equipment still resulted in <br />it compaction at the site. Based on current research, it <br />appears that the best construction techniques are only <br />capable of preventing about a third of the expected <br />increase in bulk density during construction. Further, it <br />is evident that the only truly effective technique for <br />avoiding compaction is prevention, i.e., setting limits of <br />disturbance that are capable of physically excluding all <br />construction traffic from portions of a site. <br />Techniques to Reverse Soil Compaction After Construc- <br />tion <br />Once soil is compacted, is there anything that can be <br />done to reverse the process? Many natural processes act <br />to loosen up soil, such as freezing /thawing, particle <br />sorting, earth worm activity, root penetration and the <br />gradual buildup of organic matter. Often, however, these <br />processes take decades to work, and operate primarily <br />within the first foot or so of soil. In addition, many of <br />these natural processes are effectively turned off when <br />soil compaction becomes severe (i.e., bulk density greater <br />than 1.7) because water, plant roots and soil fauna simply <br />cannot penetrate the dense soil matrix and get to work. <br />There is some evidence that the bulk density of <br />sidential lawn soils does gradually recover over sev- <br />eral decades. Legg et al. (1996) monitored the soil and <br />runoff properties of 20 residential lawns in Madison, <br />Wisconsin that ranged in age from one to 70 years. They <br />found that newly established lawns (less than three years <br />old) had the highest bulk density and lowest organic <br />matter content of all the lawns sampled. Subsequent <br />analysis indicated that these younger lawns produced <br />significantly more runoff than their older counter- <br />parts (Figure 108.1). As lawns grew older, bulk den- <br />sity declined modestly and the amount of organic <br />matter increased in the first foot of the soil profile. It <br />was speculated that root penetration, earthworms, and <br />general soil building created more macro pores, and <br />contributed to the improvement in bulk density and <br />soil quality over time. <br />Another long -term approach for restoring com- <br />pacted urban soils is reforestation. Trees and shrubs <br />gradually build soil structure through root penetra- <br />tion, leaf fall, macro pores and associated soil fauna. <br />However, this process may take decades to occur, and <br />usually requires a helping hand in urban watersheds. <br />For example, establishing trees in compacted urban <br />soils often requires the excavation of larger and deeper <br />tree pits filled with special soil mixes to allow tree <br />roots to flourish. <br />Soil Restoration Through Soil Amendments <br />A quicker technique for reducing soil compac- <br />tion involves amending the soil with organic matter <br />that has a low bulk density, such as compost, fly ash, <br />or peat. Patterson and Bates (1994) found that amend- <br />ments of sintered fly ash were able to decrease bulk <br />density by 0.17 gms /cc over a 22 -year period on soil <br />test plots on the heavily used Mall in Washington, <br />D.C. Other researchers have reported decreases in bulk <br />density of as much as 0.30 gms /cc when compost was <br />incorporated into glacial till soils in the Pacific North- <br />west (Kolsti et al., 1995). Clearly, the compost amend- <br />ment technique shows promise in reducing compac- <br />tion in urban soils, and has recently received a great <br />deal of attention as a potential practice for reducing <br />stormwater runoff problems at the site level. Much of <br />the work in this area has been conducted in the Pacific <br />Northwest, and is focused on <br />incorporating compost amend- <br />ments for new or existing resi- <br />dential lawns. <br />The compost amendment <br />practice is fairly simple, and is <br />best started in the very early <br />spring or early fall, during rela- <br />tive dry conditions. For an existing lawn, it begins <br />with a soil test to determine existing bulk density for <br />the yard. If the test indicates that soils are compacted, <br />the next step involves deep tillage of at least the top <br />foot of soil, using a rototiller or ripper. After the sod <br />has had a few months to decompose, compost is <br />incorporated into the soil at the volumetric ratio of <br />one part compost to two parts loose soil (or three to <br />four inches over the lawn). As a rule of thumb, about <br />The compost amendment <br />technique shows promise in <br />reducing compaction. <br />Watershed Protection Techniques • Vol. 3, No.2 January 2000 <br />