Laserfiche WebLink
ef.:2) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />ground water. Nitrate concentrations were <br />greatest in oxygen -rich, high redox waters, <br />while iron, manganese, arsenic, and boron all <br />increased as redox potential decreased. <br />Well diameter significantly affected water <br />quality. The effect of well diameter was <br />related to changes in redox conditions near <br />large- diameter compared to small- diameter <br />wells. Large - diameter wells had oxygen - <br />rich, high redox water, which leads to <br />elevated concentrations of nitrate and lower <br />concentrations of iron and manganese <br />compared to smaller- diameter wells. Large - <br />diameter wells do not represent a major <br />threat to an aquifer's water quality, despite <br />these findings. <br />Risk to ground water users was low for most aquifers <br />and chemicals. The percentage of samples exceeding <br />health -based drinking criteria was 8.7, 4.1, 3.3, and 2.3 <br />for boron, manganese (using a standard of 1000 ug/L), <br />nitrate, and beryllium, respectively. The percentage of <br />samples exceeding their Maximum Contaminant Level <br />(MCL) or Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level <br />(SMCL) was 67.9, 6.5, and 3.7 for iron, aluminum, and <br />sulfate, respectively. VOCs were detected in 11 <br />percent of the wells, but there were only four <br />exceedances of health -based drinking water criteria. <br />The most common VOCs were chloroform (47 <br />detections), toluene (26), xylene and benzene (13 <br />each), di -, tri-, and tetrachoroethene (3, 5, and 4, <br />respectively), and various chlorofluorocarbons (10). <br />Atrazine was detected in two wells at concentrations <br />below the drinking water standard. <br />Analysis of individual parameters included an <br />assessment of natural and anthropogenic sources for <br />each chemical, the fate of chemicals in soil and ground <br />water, factors affecting the observed distribution of <br />chemicals in groundwater, and geochemical controls on <br />distribution of chemicals in ground water. <br />Who can use information from this study? <br />The report is technical, but water planners can use the <br />baseline information to better understand factors that may <br />influence ground water quality. The `Summary Statistics' <br />and the `Factors Affecting Ground Water Quality' sectior� <br />of the report should help local water planners put what <br />they already know about the local system into a larger <br />context and determine if their area falls within expected <br />ranges for parameters of concern. This document also <br />contains information that should improve planners' <br />understanding of the vulnerability and condition of their <br />aquifer. This includes discussions of what parameters are <br />of concern, which of those are naturally occurring, and <br />which can be affected by human activity. This information <br />can also be used to improve individual monitoring plans to <br />get meaningful local information. Technical staff can use <br />the baseline data to assess background conditions for <br />aquifers and obtain information that may help make site <br />decisions. The baseline document includes geochemical <br />information that may help hydrogeologists to understand <br />the conditions in certain aquifers. Another application is <br />using the information to make risk -based decisions. <br />Example scenarios of how this might be helpful are <br />included in the full report in the summary and examples <br />sections. <br />Managers can use the baseline data to better understand <br />ground water quality issues. It also will help managers toll <br />understand potential risks to receptors and know what <br />areas would benefit from ground water protection <br />programs. The statistical summaries define background <br />values for each aquifer, providing a context for <br />Page 2 Baseline Water Quality of Minnesota's Principal Aquifers <br />