Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 31, 2000 <br />Mr. Udhe stated at the site plan review the Board will have the opportunity to identify <br />acceptable plantings for the user to put into place. However, if the berm is not identified <br />until that point, it would be quite costly to import the soil needed for the berm. <br />Kukonen asked if the residents want a berm. Mr. Udhe stated when the property was <br />rezoned they were told a berm would be put into place. Another neighborhood meeting <br />will be held next Tuesday and the issue will be raised again. <br />Acting Chair Lanyon stated he thinks there will be support for a visual barrier but he <br />would encourage them to consider options other than a berm. Mr. Johnson stated a berm <br />is beneficial at ground level and may be more perceived than real. Mr. Johnson stated he <br />thinks residents will perceive a need for a vertical component that is more than a row of <br />trees. <br />Donlin stated when the theater property was developed, a six -foot berm was created to <br />buffer their property from night -time vehicle lights. She commented on the psychological <br />benefit of having a visual screen and not being able to see a use. <br />Trehus asked if the Board needs to stipulate a buffer <br />a "given." Mr. Johnson stated they will listen to <br />be required and then the applicant can assure i <br />Mr. Johnson stated he would like to hear a <br />can with the drainage plan or is there somet <br />nature of the buffer /screening on t <br />est side of the site, or if it is <br />rehus suggested a berm <br />ly deigned and appropriate. <br />March stated he thinks the B <br />screening as opposed to <br />pine. He stated his inte <br />es: 1) have they done what they <br />e they should evaluate; and, 2) the <br />of the project. <br />ise people of the benefits of vegetative <br />d recommended a mix of red oaks and white <br />vegetative screens as opposed to berms. <br />Davidson stated her agreemen :A' d suggestion that a woodland buffer, which is <br />environmentally more sound and beautiful, be presented to the residents. <br />Trehus asked if the ponds can be made deeper. Asleson stated that will not matter due to <br />the level of the water table. Mr. Johnson advised of their monitoring well findings. <br />Kukonen stated he believes the drainage issues have been satisfied but he would support <br />further investigation of staff's proposal for a pipe under Apollo Drive. <br />O'Connell asked if the applicant would object to a Board Member attending the <br />neighborhood meeting next Tuesday to present the option of a vegetative berm. Mr. <br />Johnson stated they would welcome that opportunity. O'Connell stated she will plan to <br />attend that meeting. <br />6 <br />