My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/28/2000 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
06/28/2000 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 1:43:35 PM
Creation date
7/29/2014 11:09:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
06/28/2000
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN -23 -2000 09:31 <br />.TKDA <br />ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: Jeff Smvser. Marty Asleson <br />From: Julie Farnham <br />Date: June 22, 2000 <br />651 292 0083 P.02/09 <br />TOLT2, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON <br />AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED <br />1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA <br />444 CEDAR STREET <br />SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101.2140 <br />PHONE: 651/2924400 FAX: 651/292.0083 <br />Reference: Lino Lakes Landscape Ordinance <br />Commission No. 11997 -01 <br />Attached is the revised portion of the draft Lino Lakes Landscape Ordinance that we reviewed at <br />our meeting last week. As we discussed, this portion of the Ordinance (Sections I -IV) will be <br />forwarded to the Lino Lakes Environmental Review Board to begin their review of the draft <br />Landscape Ordinance. I have also attached an outline of the entire Ordinance to provide the <br />Board with an overview of the structure and content of the Ordinance. It is my understanding <br />• that Sections V, VI, and VII will be forward to the Board at their July meeting. <br />The structure of the Landscape Ordinance follows closely the structure used on the Tree <br />Preservation Ordinance. In particular, Sections I, II, III, IV, and VII are quite similar. One of <br />the primary differences is that the landscape and screening requirements will only apply to <br />development projects going through the site plan review process. The Tree Preservation <br />Ordinance also applies to subdivisions. <br />Section V is organized to differentiate between landscaping and screening. In short, landscaping <br />serves a more aesthetic and/or ecological function, whereas screening is intended to obscure <br />views. Generally, both Landscaping and screening objectives will need to be met on any given <br />development proposal. <br />Section VI is organized to differentiate between plant and non -plant landscaping and screening <br />materials. This section describes the more technical material requirements (e.g. size, quantity, <br />maintenance, etc.). It is recognized that both plant and non -plant materials may be used to <br />achieve the required landscaping and screening requirements. <br />• <br />JF\ <br />Attachments <br />An Equal Opportunity Employer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.