My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/29/2000 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
11/29/2000 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 12:55:40 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 8:42:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
11/29/2000
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Memorandum <br />To: Brian Wessel <br />From: Marty Asleson <br />Date: 11/21/00 <br />Re: Lino Lakes Commercial Development / JADT Dev. Group / EB. Review <br />The Environmental Board met on 5/27/98 and reviewed the Concept Plan for the <br />JADT Development Group site. Please find the staff recommendations on the <br />attached green sheet. In addition the following specific comments / and questions <br />were made: <br />Could green parking / or some other pervious type of parking surface be used for <br />overflow needs. Please find attached a copy of "Green Parking Lots ", with <br />demand ratios for selected land uses and activities. As indicated in this paper, <br />there would only be a need for about 750 parking stalls in this development <br />based on gross - leaseable square footages. Could any additional parking needs <br />be addressed in terms of a pervious surface to allow for infiltration. References <br />in the attached paper include the Institute of Traffic Engineers, and Parking <br />Standards from the American Planning Association. <br />What can be done to increase infiltration capacity in the ponding area. It appears <br />from the soil description that the pond would be constructed in a muck soil type <br />with low infiltration capacity. Bio- retention would seem to work well in this <br />area. <br />• Could the site be made more pedestrian / alternative transportation friendly in <br />design, allowing for some trails to possibly eliminate the need for additional <br />hard surface parking, allowing for more green space or green parking. It was <br />pointed out that a future proposed bridge would empty into a parking lot. <br />• What can be done to create the same design standards set forth in the Village <br />Town Center. This is an aesthetic question. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.