11/29/2000 Env Bd Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2000 • developer will need to answer the question about what the City would receive as • • incentive for considering this higher density proposal. Mach stated he believes the increased upland would be the incentive if views can be provided. Trehus suggested they consider 45 lots which provides better views and would command a higher price for the lots. Trehus asked if the current draft includes impervious calculations. Mr. Hill stated they have not. Smyser stated there is a per lot impervious percentage limitation. Asleson stated it is not always true that the most important area to retain is upland, it could be other areas as well. Donlin asked who addresses the flood plain. Smyser state d he s ek Watershed District addresses the flood plains. Mr. Fairbrother explained it deals with contours and at i : ton and a full set of plans is submitted to the Watershed District fo it nsid , .tion. The Board stated the issues they would F providing more conserved upland, view issues, and if a special habitat exis ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD BU ssed are the creation of a buffer, ion, greenway retention, stormwater o be verified by Asleson. A. Landscape Ordinances 'e — S ser stated the consultant is requesting direction before she can proc Vice Chair D son st.� , he time is late, and she would like the ability to fully discuss the ordinance : � ons of the members. Asleson stated there would be time to consider this dis ssi. ° at the next meeting. Trehus asked staf to notify the Board if the timeline changes and a decision is needed before the next meeting. Consensus was reached to table discussion to the October 25, 2000 meeting. B. Litter Ordinance — Asleson stated he spoke with the Police Chief about this ordinance and the ordinance language was included in last month's meeting information. He reviewed the tonnage of waste that is picked up and the determination that there is a litter problem.