My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/03/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
01/03/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 12:54:38 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 8:53:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
01/03/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 13, 2000 <br />Page 4 <br />Mr. Lyden stated he is aware of those concerns and has taken that information into <br />consideration when designing the pole barn. He stated that cost is not the issue, rather, it <br />is the quality of the building. He noted the added aesthetics resulting from the 5:12 roof <br />pitch of the pole barn to match that of the house, the wainscot style of siding, two foot <br />overhang, and overhead garage style door. Mr. Lyden pointed out the proposed location <br />is right next to his house so he will be constructing a quality structure. <br />Mr. Lyden stated he understands the concern related to aesthetics. However, no one will <br />build within one - quarter mile to the north or within hundreds of acres to the west. To the <br />south, the property owner is buffered by 75 feet of pine trees and has provided his <br />consent. Mr. Lyden stated this proposal will not be a negative impact to the residents or <br />future development of the City. <br />Chair Schaps stated a reading of the ordinance indicates the criteria is not met. <br />Mr. Lyden stated the siding proposed for the pole barn is higher than what is on his <br />house. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if this will be an aluminum •'c re. . Lyden stated it is and <br />explained there is a 50 year warranty on the p : ' • or, and materials. He advised of the <br />other quality aspects including the wainsc aint. <br />Mr. Rafferty commented on the main <br />on his house and asked if this is th <br />siding would consider. <br />ues he has experienced with cedar siding <br />g someone interested in maintenance free <br />Mr. Schilling asked about t .tio fan EIFS, a plasterboard siding. Mr. Lyden <br />indicted he is not aware of tha material. Mr. Schilling stated the issues of quality <br />and maintenance free material wo d be met with EIFS. <br />Mr. Lyden stated his main concern and reason for the variance request relates to the soils. <br />Ms. Lane noted the front of the structure will be visible from the street and asked if a <br />house -style of siding can be placed on the front elevation of the pole barn so it is more <br />attractive and better matches the house. <br />Mr. Lyden stated that may be a viable option and explained that his plans are to use a clay <br />colored siding and then reside the house next summer so it matches the pole barn. <br />Chair Schaps stated he is unable to vote to support this request tonight for the reasons he <br />stated. He suggested more investigation needs to be done on other siding treatments. He <br />noted that the Ordinance specifically states a prohibition to "corrugated siding and roof." <br />Mr. Lyden stated that term may be up for interpretation and he does not believe it refers <br />to the type of metal he is proposing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.