My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/28/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
02/28/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2014 4:09:12 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 11:02:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
02/28/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
St. Jude Medical -- Restoration and Prairie Gardens on a Corporate Site <br />Page 5 of 7 • <br />because of construction and grading. An herbicide was sprayed where necessary to kill existing <br />vegetation. The areas were then tilled and firmed. Seed was both drilled and hand broadcast. After <br />seeding, the site was mulched with little bluestem straw. Since some species do not establish well <br />from seed, over 2500 seedlings were then planted. Fifteen species were planted as seedlings, <br />including forbs such as Amorpha canescens (lead plant), Asclepias incarnata (swamp milkweed), and <br />Phlox pilosa (prairie phlox). The site was not irrigated. <br />A crew from Prairie Restorations, Inc. manages the prairie. It was mowed once the first season <br />(1994) and spot sprayed for thistle. In spring of 1995 and 1996, the prairie and savanna were burned. <br />A two to five year burn cycle will begin in 1997. During the summer of 1995, Rudbeckia and a few <br />other forb species bloomed in the prairie. The planting was still sparse at this time and bare soil was <br />visible. It looked "weedy" but was on track for such a young planting. <br />THE CREEK AND POND <br />To meet the goal of handling storm water on -site, a holding pond was designed. There were <br />seasonal wetlands on the site and one of these was cleared of vegetation, deepened, and reshaped. All <br />runoff from the building roof, parking lots, and sidewalks are channeled to the pond through <br />underground drain tiles or into the landscaped and prairie areas. The pond is in the prairie and <br />savanna so the vegetation around the pond includes wet prairie grasses and forbs. Water from the <br />pond is pumped up to a small pool near the building and flows down a stone creek bed back to the <br />pond. The pump aerates the water in the pond and it is hoped that this aeration will help keep the <br />water clean. The creek, with its two small pools, was installed as a typical small -scale water garden, <br />using plastic liners, landscape fabric, cobblestone and boulders. The vegetation around the pool <br />nearest the building includes Hemerocallis (daylilies) and Hosta. As the creek travels away from the <br />building more native vegetation is prevalent. <br />EVALUATION <br />It is not clear whether there was a formal evaluation process for this project. But the designer <br />continues to visit the site and watch it mature. He receives informal evaluations on the project since <br />his crew maintains the gardens. It is obvious that employees at St. Jude Medical enjoy the grounds. A <br />letter of thanks from the plant manager to Hagstrom expresses the company's enthusiasm: <br />"... thank you for really doing an outstanding job on the Woodridge facility. We receive nothing <br />but complements on the aesthetics of the facility especially of late as things are in full bloom. <br />The Woodridge facility is truly a showcase for St. Jude Medical and we bring many surgeons, <br />public officials, and other dignitaries through this facility and all comment on the aesthetics of <br />our landscaping." <br />Such a complement, of course, says nothing about the success of the restoration of the natural areas. <br />Prairie Restorations, Inc. is satisfied with the progress the prairie is making. Because the landscape is <br />so young, the ecological accomplishments of the project are difficult to assess. It is possible, <br />however, to evaluate whether the designer's goals for a sustainable landscape have been achieved. <br />1. Requires minimal or no irrigation. The plants in the gardens are drought tolerant. Watering was <br />done the first year to ensure successful establishment, but is no longer necessary. The prairie, <br />savanna, and woodland cover well over 3/4 the site and are not irrigated. Only the turf areas <br />(approximately 1/2 acre) require regular watering. <br />2. Handles storm water on -site. Thus far, it seems this goal has been met. The holding pond <br />http: / /www.hort. agri. umn .edu /h5015 /96papers /gayner.htm 2/22/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.