My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 2:05:24 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 12:42:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
05/30/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes - Development Framework <br />page Page -by -Page Comments and Questions by WUI Work Group <br />The City should use its comp. plan as an opportunity to talk about their needed water <br />conservation efforts. The DNR will require the city to prove that they are making efforts <br />to promote water conservation and water conservation education before they are allowed <br />increases in water use. <br />102 Storm Sewer <br />See comments above on pp. 23 and 45. Include strategies to avoid impacts to natural <br />wetlands and incorporate LID concepts. <br />102 Parks & Trails <br />How adequate is the Comprehensive Park Plan and Development Guide (1992) in <br />addressing the conservation and ongoing management of natural resources and native <br />plant communities, including the City's role in acquisition of critical sites? <br />103 Schools <br />See comments above on schools. <br />PLANNING DISTRICTS <br />129 -135 Planning District 3 - Northwest <br />#16 Can the location (or not) of the streets be predicated on not impacting natural <br />features? <br />153 -159 Planning District 6 - Northeast <br />How does this plan relate to Hugo's plans, particularly concerning land use <br />compatibility, Clearwater and Hardwood Creeks, and greenway and trail <br />connections? <br />IMPLEMENTATION <br />167 -168 Environment <br />#1. How adequately does the HEP &CD cover a broad range of environmental <br />conservation efforts? E.g. how does it relate to City's Tree Ordinance? What more is <br />needed on management of non -fire dependent native plant communities? How is <br />DNR natural heritage information incorporated? How can wildlife elements be <br />strengthened (see above)? How are conifer plantations to be conserved and managed? <br />169 -171 Ordinances <br />169 -170 #1. The City is invited work with DNR to upgrade these ordinances to better carry out <br />the policies in this document. <br />171 #2 What does it mean to "re- examine the City's tree preservation standards "? I.e., what <br />direction is the city going in tree preservation? Also, consider a requirement that <br />developers be required to prove that every lot in a proposed subdivision has a <br />building site that is totally suitable for development. How can the City's subdivision <br />requirements incorporate LID practices? <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.