My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 2:05:24 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 12:42:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
05/30/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Asleson noted that there were several lists, and assured the Board that the Ryan/Target representatives <br />would receive them. Donlin indicated that the Board members would like the lists to be sent to them <br />by E -Mail. <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />MINUTES <br />DATE : February 28, 2001 <br />PROJECT REVIEW <br />A. Ryan/Target Project Submittal (Item 1 -01) — Wessel stated the application was incomplete and <br />Ryan has asked for a respite. He advised that a staff review of the plan would be held the following <br />day and the process would need to be renegotiated and the regulatory process reinitiated. The new <br />plan was to be smaller scale and they still wished to break ground in July. At present the plan would <br />be revised by April, with the Environmental Board reviewing it at the March meeting. The response <br />from the community caused Target to drop the proposed three large commercial sites to the West. <br />The Target building would be moved over to the West of the initial site. There would be six to eight <br />smaller commercial sites with three to eight thousand square feet each. The wetland would be left <br />alone, and a strip north of 77th Street would remain undeveloped. Wessel asked for comments on <br />where to mitigate. <br />Trehus arrived at 6:40 p.m. <br />Donlin asked the number of parking spaces proposed, and was the swamp to remain <br />untouched. Wessel answered the number of parking spaces would be reduced, but he was unclear by <br />the number and did not know the plans concerning the area of the swamp. <br />Donlin asked if the plan proposed in March would be considered finished and approved. <br />Wessel responded typically a project similar in scope would require a year to go through the planning <br />stage, but for this project, it is a few months. <br />Chair Lanyon stated that they already know what to expect from the Board, but the Board could give <br />additional comments. <br />Wessel noted if the project did not break ground in July, the project would be discontinued. <br />Asleson mentioned that the building was moved over and the number of parking spaces was reduced. <br />Mach indicated that the plot was not protected and secure, and asked about the hydrology issues. <br />Asleson explained the hydrological issues were unknown, but the Watershed District was dealing <br />with them. <br />17aplco_& Pe%psaraov_Boap5 Xtra oq Aivo Away- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.