My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:49:13 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 9:35:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
06/27/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 28, 2001 <br />Mr. Goertz indicated the development area would have a three -foot bounce, with <br />a two -foot bounce in the upland areas. <br />Donlin asked for clarification that the water could increase three feet before it <br />would affect the proposed development. Mr. Goertz responded that most <br />developments in the area would be affected, especially the golf course. <br />Mr. Goertz mentioned there were two lots, which would require a considerable <br />amount of fill in the northeast. He received permission from the County to dig <br />into the river. A conservation easement runs across all the lots in the west. <br />Asleson explained that the area was a planned greenway, however, the County at <br />present has not needed it. <br />Trehus asked if there was a trail planned with a boardwalk through the wetland. <br />Asleson noted that the County planned on paralleling Birch Street to connect to <br />the County park. <br />Trehus inquired where the upland was located. Mr. Goertz answered that most of <br />the upland had wetland vegetation on it. <br />Donlin inquired if the language in the owners' association accounted for a scenic <br />trail. Asleson noted it was beneficial to have guidelines for the association. <br />Trehus identified the area to have a high ecological value according to the maps, <br />and requested bigger buffers. Asleson concurred, and suggested creating swails <br />in the area He explained that Mr. Goertz' sr engineers were meeting with the <br />Watershed District tonight. <br />Mr. Goertz explained that the Watershed District's recommendations were four <br />pages long, but none of them required difficult changes. <br />Chair Lanyon commented he was encouraged by the plans proposed, but <br />mentioned the buildings come quite close together, and urged opening up the <br />views. Mr. Goertz responded noting no buildings were closer than 70 feet. <br />Asleson mentioned they had submitted landscape plans with native plantings in <br />the natural areas. <br />Trehus questioned the number of units in the townhomes. Mr. Goertz identified <br />49 units, and 31 single homes. <br />Chair Lanyon stated that although the distance between the houses was no closer <br />than 70 feet and trees were present, the connections were too narrow for wildlife. <br />Asleson offered there was escrow money for trees. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.