My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:49:13 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 9:35:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
06/27/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING APRIL 25, 2001 <br />Donlin expressed concern over a 500 year event, and wanted to know where the water <br />would go in those instances. She noted there had been three such events in 10 days in <br />1992. Mr. Payton indicated a 100 year event of 5.9 inches would discharge over a 48 <br />hour period. Emergency overflow would move toward Highway 35W, the flow direction <br />would not change. <br />Trehus indicated the water would eventually flow into George Watch Lake, and in an <br />event over two inches would move too quickly. Mr. Payton explained he did not have the <br />numbers for the water volume. The total capacity of the pond was 9.9 acre ft. of storage, <br />however, all surfaces receive water. He explained the flow will either go over the land or <br />underground. <br />Trehus urged a reviewal of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet by the Board <br />before the City Council approved the project. Asieson noted the proposal was to be <br />submitted after the present meeting and it would receive approval before the next <br />meeting. <br />Wessel stated final approval was to come in July. <br />O'Connell inquired about the treatment of oils and gases in the water. Mr Payton <br />explained that because petroleum products float, there would be a skimming feature. <br />The Board discussed lighting and signage. Kukoneninqui:red whether Target would be <br />willing to use a non - backlit logo. Mr. Payton answered the sign should be visible to the <br />East and West where there were mainly busine es.. <br />Vice Chair Mach asked if all the stores had -filar lighting and signage. Mr. Payton <br />responded the store plans accommodate the requirements of the planning and zoning in <br />each city. <br />The issue of parking spaces was discussed in 'relation to the ordinances and the <br />requirements of the stores. 'iffiin Grundhofer :noted the City requirements were exceeded by <br />103 spaces. <br />Mr. Payton address edtthe green space in relation to parking. He explained that questions <br />remain as to where the green space is distributed. If within the parking lot, they could <br />create visual barriers causingxaccidents. If it were a block on the side, it would create an <br />unbrokenpavement. <br />Trehus urged Target/Ryan to reduce the number of spaces and explore green parking, <br />because ofie potential degradation of George Watch Lake. Mr. Payton answered <br />impervious of green parking was difficult to maintain with shopping carts, and dirt mud <br />tracking in the stores. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.