My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:49:13 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 9:35:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
06/27/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING APRIL 25, 2001 <br />Trehus inquired about the conservation easements in light of the large lots encroaching on <br />the wetlands. He asked if the Planning and Zoning Board was going to see this plan. <br />Asleson answered the greenway with the trail was the change in the plan, at one time the <br />area was biodiverse. <br />Trehus questioned the location and type of the path, and whether it was going to be on the <br />ecotone. Asleson responded there was a way to put a paved path through the center of the <br />ecosystem, and not the edges to minimize the environmental impact. <br />Vice Chair Mach submitted that if the trails went through nice areas it could raise <br />environmental consciousness. <br />Grundhofer indicated the tree legend needed to be clear, and asked staff for his <br />recommendations. Asleson answered no changes, and advised that because of time <br />constraints, the Board would probably not be asked to comment again. <br />The Board discussed the population growth and traffic concerns. If a hold on new MUSA <br />would be recommended, the greenway would probably be lost. <br />Trehus mentioned reducing the size of the lots to preserve open space. Asleson <br />responded that Planning and Zoning Board objected to it, and so he negotiated the <br />greenway. <br />O'Connell recommended approval but with strong reservations. about the number of <br />homes being built in one year in light of 147 homes as an annual total. In addition, the <br />number of trees saved versus lost neededito beclarifie on the plat map. <br />Grundhofer moved to recommend approval with e reservations. O'Connell seconded <br />the motion. Motion passed 5 to Trehps) f <br />F. 64th and 20t "/Variance Request ,= r. Valentine introduced himself as the project leader <br />and Tom Carlson as the new owner. Mr. Valentine had known the original owner for 10 <br />years. <br />Trehus noted¢tle need for an alternative site for a septic tank. <br />Mr. Valentine stated:it was a 2.82 acre triangular site, where he tried to stay out of the <br />wetlands''-and`preservethe trees. <br />Grundhofer indicated her concern for the mound septic tank, where any pollutants would <br />go directly into the wetland. <br />Asleson recommended Mr. Valentine work with the Vadnais Heights Watershed District. <br />Mr. Valentine reported speaking with them and noted the delineation report indicated <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.