Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 30, 2001 <br />B. April 25, 2001— The following corrections were requested: <br />Page 3, sixth paragraph: "Kukonen inquired whether Target would be willing to use a <br />non - backlit logo like the Shoreview store. <br />Grundhofer moved to approve the April 25, 2001 meeting minutes as amended above. <br />O'Connell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />APPROVAL OF AGENDA <br />The following items were added to the meeting agenda: <br />• Discuss population caps under section 6D — Donlin. <br />• Discuss communications with other bodies in the City section 6E — Trehus. <br />• Discuss pond contamination section 7D — Asleson. <br />The agenda was approved as amended above. <br />CITIZEN COMMENTS <br />Brian Wessel Community Development Director for t <br />retiring in four months and that Michael Grochala would b <br />month overlap. <br />No other comments were made. <br />PROJECT REVIEW <br />tifie the Board that he would be <br />arcing next week, leaving a four- <br />A. Ryan/Target/Target Su s for pdate — Wessel noted the official name was the <br />Market Place Project, with it _ operational July 2002. The City Council decision <br />would be on July 23, 2001, an would be breaking ground in September. The June 13, <br />2001 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting would make a recommendation. On July 11, <br />2001 the Council would approve the Environmental Assessment Worksheet, and begin a <br />30 -day reviewal process. He reviewed that the project included a Target, Kohl's, several <br />small business pads, and the wetland mitigation was moving ahead. <br />Chair Lanyon clarified the project would go to the Planning and Zoning Board before the <br />next meeting with the comments from the Board. <br />Asleson pointed out that the Environmental Assessment Worksheet would be a large <br />document when it was completed with responses from other agencies included in it. Mr. <br />Payton indicated the Environmental Assessment Worksheet consisted of their answers to <br />31 questions and was ready for distribution to the 25 agencies for the 30 -day comment <br />period. All comments needed to be addressed. <br />2 <br />