My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:49:13 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 9:35:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
06/27/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TREE PRESERVATION POLICY <br />materials within the critical root zones of trees. <br />3. Changes in soil chemistry will adversely affect tree <br />survival. The moist frequent occurrence is the change (decrease) in <br />soil acidity by concrete washout. Most trees native to Anoka County <br />area prefer slightly acid soils; concrete residues are highly <br />basic. The leakage or spillage of toxic materials such as fuels or <br />paints can be fatal for trees. <br />D. Trunk and crown disturbances are generally mechanical in <br />nature and are either caused directly by clearing and grading <br />machinery, or indirectly by debris being cleared and falling into <br />trees marked for protection. <br />1. Common forms of damage include stripped bark and cambium, <br />split trunks, and broken limbs. <br />2. Damage also occurs from the posting of signs such as <br />building permits, or survey markers on trees. <br />3. Indirect damage can be caused by the placement of burn . <br />holes or debris fires too close to trees. The possible range of <br />damages include scorched trunks with some cambial dieback, the loss <br />of foliage due to evaporative heat stress (leaf desiccation), and <br />completely burned trunks and crowns. <br />SECTION VI. METHODS OF TREE PROTECTION <br />A. Planning and considerations. Tree space is the most critical <br />factor in tree protection throughout the development process. The <br />root system of trees can easily extend beyond the dripline of the <br />tree canopy (Figure 3). The root system within the dripline region <br />is generally considered to be the critical root zone. Disturbance <br />within this zone can directly affect a tree's chances. With <br />reference to root zones, the following standards shall apply: <br />1. The use of tree save islands and stands is encouraged <br />rather than the protection of individual (non - specimen) trees <br />scattered throughout a site. This will facilitate ease in overall <br />site organization as related to tree protection. <br />2. The protective zone of specimen trees or stands of trees or <br />otherwise designated tree save areas shall include no less than the <br />total area beneath the tree(s) canopy as defined by the farthest <br />canopy dripline of the tree(s). In some instances, the City <br />Forester may require a protective zone in excess of the area <br />defined by the tree's dripline. <br />3. Layout of the project site utility and grading plans should <br />accommodate the required tree protective zones. Utilities must be <br />placed along corridors between tree protective zones. <br />4. Construction site activities such as parking, material <br />storage, concrete washout, hole placement, etc., shall be arranged <br />so as to prevent disturbances within tree protective zones. <br />5. No disturbance shall occur within the protective zone of <br />the specimen trees or stands of trees without prior approval by the <br />City Forester. <br />B. Protective Barriers <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.